35 Cited authorities

  1. Central Hudson Gas Elec. v. Public Serv. Comm'n

    447 U.S. 557 (1980)   Cited 2,052 times   105 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a restriction on commercial speech must directly advance a substantial governmental interest
  2. Abood v. Detroit Board of Education

    431 U.S. 209 (1977)   Cited 861 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding that compelling nonmember employees to contribute to union's political activities infringes employees' First Amendment rights
  3. Lebron v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

    513 U.S. 374 (1995)   Cited 392 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a corporation is subject to constitutional claims if, among other things, the government "retains for itself permanent authority to appoint a majority of the directors of corporation"
  4. Johanns v. Livestock Mtg. Assoc

    544 U.S. 550 (2005)   Cited 200 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that beef advertising campaign constituted government speech because the "message set out in the beef promotions is from beginning to end the message established by the Federal Government"
  5. United States v. United Foods, Inc.

    533 U.S. 405 (2001)   Cited 189 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that regulations forcing mushroom producers to fund generic advertising violated the First Amendment, even though they "[did] not compel the expression of political or ideological views"
  6. Keller v. State Bar of California

    496 U.S. 1 (1990)   Cited 215 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "compelled association" of state bar was justified by the "State's interest in regulating the legal profession and improving the quality of legal services"
  7. Brown v. Ransweiler

    171 Cal.App.4th 516 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 353 times
    Holding that if an officer's "use of . . . force [was] objectively reasonable under the circumstances," then the officer "met his duty to use reasonable care . . . and, as a matter of law, cannot be found to have been negligent in this regard"
  8. Glickman v. Wileman Brothers Elliott, Inc.

    521 U.S. 457 (1997)   Cited 108 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court of Appeals erred in relying on Central Hudson for the purpose of testing the constitutionality of government-mandated assessments for promotional advertising
  9. Gerawan Farming v. Lyons

    24 Cal.4th 468 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 214 times
    Holding that the California Constitution provides greater protection to commercial speech
  10. Barrett v. Rosenthal

    40 Cal.4th 33 (Cal. 2006)   Cited 164 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that CDA immunity extended to individuals who republish via the Internet defamatory statements originally made by others in email and internet postings
  11. Section 65500 - Production and marketing of grapes

    Cal. Food & Agr. Code § 65500   Cited 5 times

    (a) Grapes produced in California for fresh human consumption comprise one of the major agricultural crops of California, and the production and marketing of such grapes affects the economy, welfare, standard of living and health of a large number of citizens residing in this state. (b) Increased plantings of vineyards and improved cultural practices for the production of California grapes for fresh human consumption have increased and will continue to increase the production thereof and unless the

  12. Section 65572 - Powers and duties of commission

    Cal. Food & Agr. Code § 65572   Cited 4 times

    The powers and duties of the commission shall include the following: (a) To elect a chairman, and from time to time such other officers as it may deem advisable, and to delegate to such officers such administrative duties as may appear advisable. (b) To adopt and from time to time alter, rescind, modify and amend all proper and necessary rules, regulations and orders for the exercise of its powers and the performance of its duties, including rules for regulation of appeals from any rule, regulation

  13. Section 65550 - California Table Grape Commission

    Cal. Food & Agr. Code § 65550   Cited 4 times

    There is hereby created the California Table Grape Commission to be thus known and designated. The commission shall be composed of 21 fresh grape producers appointed by the director from the nominees selected as provided by this article and one public member appointed pursuant to Section 65575.1. Ca. Food and Agric. Code § 65550 Amended by Stats. 1978, Ch. 168.

  14. Section 65575.1 - Public member of commission

    Cal. Food & Agr. Code § 65575.1   Cited 3 times

    Not later than April 1 of 1979, and each third year thereafter, the commission shall submit to the director the names of three or more natural persons, each of whom shall be a citizen and resident of this state and not a producer, shipper, or processor nor financially interested in any producer, shipper, or processor, for appointment by the director as a public member of the commission. The director shall, not later than April 30 of 1979, and each third year thereafter, appoint one of the nominees

  15. Section 65563 - Tabulation of votes, announcement of names of persons nominated, and appointment of member

    Cal. Food & Agr. Code § 65563   Cited 3 times

    Upon expiration of the voting period the director shall tabulate all votes and shall announce the names of those persons nominated for appointment as members of the commission from each district and shall appoint one of the two nominees from each district as a member of the commission; provided that in the appointment of the first members of the commission after this chapter becomes effective the director shall appoint three of the six nominees from each district as members of the commission to serve

  16. Section 58841 - Advisory board

    Cal. Food & Agr. Code § 58841   Cited 3 times

    Any marketing order which is issued pursuant to this chapter shall provide for the establishment of an advisory board to assist the director in the administration of any marketing order. The members of the advisory board shall be appointed by the director and may hold office at the pleasure of the director. A marketing order may, however, provide for the appointment of members from nominations made by the producers and handlers and may also provide for the method of selecting such nominees. Ca. Food

  17. Section 65551 - Corporate body; corporate seal

    Cal. Food & Agr. Code § 65551   Cited 2 times

    The California Table Grape Commission shall be and is hereby declared and created a corporate body. It shall have the power to sue and be sued, to contract and be contracted with, and to have and possess all of the powers of a corporation. It shall adopt a corporate seal. Copies of its proceedings, records and acts, when certified by the secretary and authenticated by the corporate seal, shall be admissable in evidence in all courts of the state, and shall be prima facie evidence of the truth of

  18. Section 65556 - Election of member

    Cal. Food & Agr. Code § 65556   Cited 2 times

    Each member for each district shall be elected by a plurality of votes cast by producers in the district. Each producer who has grown fresh grapes in a district in the year preceding any election shall be entitled to two votes in such district, one for each of two nominees. In the first election after the effective date of this chapter, each producer entitled to vote in a district shall be entitled to six votes in such district, one for each of the six nominees, and the six nominees receiving the

  19. Section 65650 - Action for collection of assessment, civil penalties, or injunctive relief

    Cal. Food & Agr. Code § 65650   Cited 2 times

    The commission may, if it believes a violation of this chapter or any rule or regulation has occurred, or in the event of nonpayment of any assessment, bring an action in its name for collection of such assessment, civil penalties or for injunctive relief, including specific performance, of any obligation imposed by this chapter or any rule or regulation issued hereunder, or both, against any person violating any provisions of this chapter or any rule or regulation duly issued by the commission hereunder

  20. Section 65571 - Liability

    Cal. Food & Agr. Code § 65571   Cited 1 times

    The State of California shall not be liable for the acts of the commission or its contracts. Payment of all claims arising by reason of the administration of this chapter or acts of the commission shall be limited to the funds collected by the commission. No member of the commission or any employee or agent thereof shall be personally liable on the contracts of the commission nor shall a commissioner or employees of such commission be responsible individually in any way to any producer or shipper

  21. Rule 8.504 - Form and contents of petition, answer, and reply

    Cal. R. 8.504   Cited 21 times

    (a)In general Except as provided in this rule, a petition for review, answer, and reply must comply with the relevant provisions of rule 8.204. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007.) (b) Contents of a petition (1) The body of the petition must begin with a concise, nonargumentative statement of the issues presented for review, framing them in terms of the facts of the case but without unnecessary detail. (2) The petition must explain how the case presents a ground for review under rule 8.500(b)