11 Cited authorities

Evangelatos v. Superior Court
44 Cal.3d 1188 (Cal. 1988) Cited 538 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that a measure, which modified the traditional, common law joint and several liability doctrine, did not apply to claims for relief that had accrued before the effective date of the new law
Barratt American, Inc. v. City of Rancho Cucamonga
37 Cal.4th 685 (Cal. 2005) Cited 53 times 1 Legal Analyses
Stating that section 66014 covers fees for "zoning and building permits"
City of San Diego v. Shapiro
228 Cal.App.4th 756 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014) Cited 22 times
In Shapiro, only the landowners (of hotel properties), who could pass the tax on to their hotel guests, were allowed to vote for the tax.
Brooktrails Twp. Cmty. Servs. Dist. v. Bd. of Supervisors of Mendocino Cnty.
218 Cal.App.4th 195 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013) Cited 20 times
Discussing Prop. 26
AB Cellular LA, LLC v. City of Los Angeles
150 Cal.App.4th 747 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007) Cited 15 times
No. B185373. May 9, 2007. Appeal from the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. BS085781, David P. Yaffe, Judge. Munger, Tolles Olson, Stuart N. Senator and Michelle Friedland for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Colantuono Levin, Michael G. Colantuono, Sandra J. Levin, Lawrence G. Permaul and Amy C. Sparrow for Defendant and Appellant. Jarvis, Fay Doporto and Benjamin P. Fay for League of California Cities as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant. OPINION ASHMANN-GERST, J. The power to
Southern Cal. Gas Co. v. Public Utilities Com
23 Cal.3d 470 (Cal. 1979) Cited 15 times
Docket No. S.F. 23495. February 28, 1979. COUNSEL William M. Pfeiffer, Thomas D. Clarke, David B. Follett, Lawrence M. Stone, Irell Manella, Richard H. Borow, Susan I. Spivak and Francis J. Mirabello for Petitioner. Richard D. Gravelle, J. Calvin Simpson, John S. Fick, Janice E. Kerr, Hector Anninos and Walter H. Kessenick for Respondents. Burt Pines, City Attorney, Thomas C. Bonaventura, Assistant City Attorney, and Leonard L. Snaider, Deputy City Attorney, for Real Party in Interest. OPINION BIRD
City and County of San Francisco v. Public Util. Com
6 Cal.3d 119 (Cal. 1971) Cited 21 times
Docket Nos. S.F. 22794, 22793. November 26, 1971. COUNSEL Thomas M. O'Connor, City Attorney, Milton H. Mares, Deputy City Attorney, and William F. Bourne for Petitioner in No. 22794. Garret Shean, in pro. per., and William M. Bennett for Petitioners in No. 22793. Mary Moran Pajalich and Timothy E. Treacy for Respondents. Warren A. Palmer as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Respondents. Pillsbury, Madison Sutro, John A. Sutro, Noble K. Gregory, George H. Eckhardt, Jr., and Richard W. Odgers for Real Party
Section 9605 - Amendments; prevailing statutes; higher chapter number
Cal. Gov. Code § 9605 Cited 140 times
Providing that, when a section is affected by two or more acts at the same session of the legislature, the later chaptered enactment supersedes the earlier chaptered enactment
Section 1
Cal. Const. art. XIIIC § 1 Cited 63 times
Exempting from the definition of tax " charge imposed for the reasonable regulatory costs to a local government for issuing licenses and permits, performing investigations, inspections, and audits, enforcing agricultural marketing orders, and the administrative enforcement and adjudication thereof"
Section 201 - Title of part
Cal. Pub. Util. Code § 201 Cited 33 times
This part may be cited as the "Public Utilities Act." Ca. Pub. Util. Code § 201 Enacted by Stats. 1951, Ch. 764.
Rule 8.520 - Briefs by parties and amici curiae; judicial notice
Cal. R. 8.520 Cited 3,153 times
(a)Parties' briefs; time to file (1) Within 30 days after the Supreme Court files the order of review, the petitioner must serve and file in that court either an opening brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (2) Within 30 days after the petitioner files its brief or the time to do so expires, the opposing party must serve and file either an answer brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (3) The petitioner may file a reply brief on the merits or

CITIZENS FOR FAIR REU RATES v. CITY OF REDDING

11 Cited authorities

Holding that a measure, which modified the traditional, common law joint and several liability doctrine, did not apply to claims for relief that had accrued before the effective date of the new law

Stating that section 66014 covers fees for "zoning and building permits"

In Shapiro, only the landowners (of hotel properties), who could pass the tax on to their hotel guests, were allowed to vote for the tax.

Discussing Prop. 26

Providing that, when a section is affected by two or more acts at the same session of the legislature, the later chaptered enactment supersedes the earlier chaptered enactment

Exempting from the definition of tax " charge imposed for the reasonable regulatory costs to a local government for issuing licenses and permits, performing investigations, inspections, and audits, enforcing agricultural marketing orders, and the administrative enforcement and adjudication thereof"