87 Cited authorities

  1. Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.

    473 U.S. 432 (1985)   Cited 8,058 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that policies enacted with "a bare ... desire to harm a politically unpopular group" cannot be upheld under equal protection (quoting U.S. Dep't of Agric. v. Moreno , 413 U.S. 528, 534, 93 S.Ct. 2821, 37 L.Ed.2d 782 (1973) )
  2. Riley v. California

    573 U.S. 373 (2014)   Cited 1,609 times   88 Legal Analyses
    Holding that searching a person's phone incident to their arrest violated the Fourth Amendment, but not discussing the application of that holding within the automobile-exception context
  3. United States v. Jones

    565 U.S. 400 (2012)   Cited 1,503 times   109 Legal Analyses
    Holding warrantless placement of GPS tracker on defendant's vehicle unconstitutional
  4. United States v. Ross

    456 U.S. 798 (1982)   Cited 3,702 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that search under the automobile exception extends only to areas "that may conceal the object of the search"
  5. Heller v. Doe

    509 U.S. 312 (1993)   Cited 2,034 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts must accept a legislature's generalizations under rational basis review "even when there is an imperfect fit between means and ends" or where the classification "is not made with mathematical nicety"
  6. Gerstein v. Pugh

    420 U.S. 103 (1975)   Cited 4,131 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Fourth Amendment requires a judicial determination of probable cause as a prerequisite to any extended restraint on liberty following an arrest
  7. United States v. Hensley

    469 U.S. 221 (1985)   Cited 2,211 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that police officers may make a Terry stop based on reasonable suspicion developed by other officers
  8. County of Riverside v. McLaughlin

    500 U.S. 44 (1991)   Cited 1,556 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that detentions of more than 48 hours without a judicial determination of probable cause are presumptively unconstitutional
  9. United States v. Robinson

    414 U.S. 218 (1973)   Cited 3,133 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that law enforcement officers are authorized to conduct a full search of every lawful custodial arrestee
  10. San Antonio School District v. Rodriguez

    411 U.S. 1 (1973)   Cited 2,911 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that classifications on the basis of geography are not suspect
  11. Section 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

    42 U.S.C. § 1983   Cited 401,501 times   583 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any state actor who "subjects, or causes [a person] to be subjected" to a constitutional violation
  12. Section 28

    Cal. Const. art. I § 28   Cited 1,598 times
    Establishing the state constitutional right of victims "[t]o prevent the disclosure of confidential information or records to the defendant.... which could be used to locate or harass the victim.... or which are otherwise privileged or confidential by law"
  13. Section 14135a - Transferred

    42 U.S.C. § 14135a   Cited 780 times
    Authorizing the Attorney General to “collect DNA samples from individuals who are arrested, facing charges, or convicted”
  14. Section 1

    Cal. Const. art. I § 1   Cited 548 times
    Providing "[a]ll people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights," including the right of "privacy"
  15. Section 14132 - Transferred

    42 U.S.C. § 14132   Cited 122 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Permitting expungement of FBI DNA records in certain cases after a conviction is overturned
  16. Section 2-504 - Collection of DNA samples

    Md. Code, Pub. Safety § 2-504   Cited 15 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Listing crimes that qualify charges or convictions for DNA collection
  17. Section 14133 - Transferred

    42 U.S.C. § 14133   Cited 8 times
    Allowing for disclosure of samples in CODIS to a defendant "for criminal defense purposes."
  18. Rule 8.500 - Petition for review

    Cal. R. 8.500   Cited 248 times

    (a)Right to file a petition, answer, or reply (1) A party may file a petition in the Supreme Court for review of any decision of the Court of Appeal, including any interlocutory order, except the denial of a transfer of a case within the appellate jurisdiction of the superior court. (2) A party may file an answer responding to the issues raised in the petition. In the answer, the party may ask the court to address additional issues if it grants review. (3) The petitioner may file a reply to the answer

  19. Rule 8.516 - Issues on review

    Cal. R. 8.516   Cited 56 times

    (a)Issues to be briefed and argued (1) On or after ordering review, the Supreme Court may specify the issues to be briefed and argued. Unless the court orders otherwise, the parties must limit their briefs and arguments to those issues and any issues fairly included in them. (2) Notwithstanding an order specifying issues under (1), the court may, on reasonable notice, order oral argument on fewer or additional issues or on the entire cause. (b)Issues to be decided (1) The Supreme Court may decide