§Why CasetextPricing

PEOPLE v. BUZA

Respondent’s Reply Brief on the Merits

87 Cited authorities

  1. Riley v. California

    573 U.S. 373 (2014)   Cited 2,601 times   90 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employee had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the call records and text messages contained on a cell phone owned by his employer because he "had a right to exclude others from using the phone" and explaining that "a property interest in the item searched is only one factor in the analysis, and lack thereof is not dispositive"

  2. Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.

    473 U.S. 432 (1985)   Cited 9,684 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that mental disability is not a quasi-suspect class

  3. United States v. Jones

    565 U.S. 400 (2012)   Cited 1,857 times   109 Legal Analyses
    Holding that installation of a tracking device was "a physical intrusion would have been considered a ‘search’ within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment when it was adopted"

  4. United States v. Ross

    456 U.S. 798 (1982)   Cited 4,140 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that search under the automobile exception extends only to areas "that may conceal the object of the search"

  5. Heller v. Doe

    509 U.S. 312 (1993)   Cited 2,338 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts must accept a legislature's generalizations under rational basis review "even when there is an imperfect fit between means and ends" or where the classification "is not made with mathematical nicety"

  6. Gerstein v. Pugh

    420 U.S. 103 (1975)   Cited 4,596 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Fourth Amendment requires a judicial determination of probable cause as a prerequisite to any extended restraint on liberty following an arrest

  7. United States v. Hensley

    469 U.S. 221 (1985)   Cited 2,527 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if police have a reasonable suspicion, grounded in specific and articulable facts, that a person they encounter was involved in or is wanted in connection with a completed felony, then a Terry stop may be made to investigate that suspicion"

  8. County of Riverside v. McLaughlin

    500 U.S. 44 (1991)   Cited 1,749 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that detentions of more than 48 hours without a judicial determination of probable cause are presumptively unconstitutional

  9. Florence v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of the Cnty. of Burlington

    566 U.S. 318 (2012)   Cited 789 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a county jail could constitutionally require all inmates, including those arrested for minor offenses, to submit to visual strip searches as part of the process of being admitted to the jail’s general population

  10. United States v. Robinson

    414 U.S. 218 (1973)   Cited 3,358 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that law enforcement officers are authorized to conduct a full search of every lawful custodial arrestee

  11. Section 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

    42 U.S.C. § 1983   Cited 485,542 times   688 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any state actor who "subjects, or causes [a person] to be subjected" to a constitutional violation

  12. Section 28

    Cal. Const. art. I § 28   Cited 2,118 times
    Granting crime victims the right "[t]o reasonable notice of all public proceedings, including delinquency proceedings, upon request, at which the defendant and the prosecutor are entitled to be present"

  13. Section 1

    Cal. Const. art. I § 1   Cited 1,056 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing "[a]ll people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights," including the right of "privacy"

  14. Section 14135a - Transferred

    42 U.S.C. § 14135a   Cited 893 times
    Authorizing the Attorney General to “collect DNA samples from individuals who are arrested, facing charges, or convicted”

  15. Section 14132 - Transferred

    42 U.S.C. § 14132   Cited 126 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Permitting expungement of FBI DNA records in certain cases after a conviction is overturned

  16. Section 2-504 - Collection of DNA samples

    Md. Code, Pub. Safety § 2-504   Cited 22 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Listing crimes that qualify charges or convictions for DNA collection

  17. Section 14133 - Transferred

    42 U.S.C. § 14133   Cited 9 times
    Allowing for disclosure of samples in CODIS to a defendant "for criminal defense purposes."

  18. Rule 8.500 - Petition for review

    Cal. R. 8.500   Cited 337 times

    (a)Right to file a petition, answer, or reply (1) A party may file a petition in the Supreme Court for review of any decision of the Court of Appeal, including any interlocutory order, except the denial of a transfer of a case within the appellate jurisdiction of the superior court. (2) A party may file an answer responding to the issues raised in the petition. In the answer, the party may ask the court to address additional issues if it grants review. (3) The petitioner may file a reply to the answer

  19. Rule 8.516 - Issues on review

    Cal. R. 8.516   Cited 119 times

    (a)Issues to be briefed and argued (1) On or after ordering review, the Supreme Court may specify the issues to be briefed and argued. Unless the court orders otherwise, the parties must limit their briefs and arguments to those issues and any issues fairly included in them. (2) Notwithstanding an order specifying issues under (1), the court may, on reasonable notice, order oral argument on fewer or additional issues or on the entire cause. (b)Issues to be decided (1) The Supreme Court may decide