13 Cited authorities

  1. Martinez v. Combs

    49 Cal.4th 35 (Cal. 2010)   Cited 407 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Holding that California's wage and hour laws do not impose liability on "individual corporate agents acting within the scope of their agency"
  2. Ayala v. Antelope Valley Newspapers, Inc.

    59 Cal.4th 522 (Cal. 2014)   Cited 135 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding trial court's finding that "substantial variations in control exist" is "sufficient to justify denying class certification and thus obviate any need for further inquiry [into secondary factors]"
  3. California Redevelopment Ass'n v. Matosantos

    53 Cal.4th 231 (Cal. 2011)   Cited 132 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that legislation dissolving community redevelopment agencies is constitutional and establishing a dissolution date of February 1, 2012, for all agencies.
  4. Agnew v. California State Board of Equalization

    21 Cal.4th 310 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 108 times
    Discussing the validity of the State Board of Equalization's policy requiring payments on delinquent taxes and accrued interest on taxes
  5. Sebago v. Bos. Cab Dispatch, Inc.

    471 Mass. 321 (Mass. 2015)   Cited 37 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Sebago v. Boston Cab Dispatch, Inc., 471 Mass. 321, 28 N.E.3d 1139, 1150–51 (2015), the court analyzed two cases from Illinois involving drivers for hire.
  6. Carpet Remnant Warehouse v. Dept. of Labor

    125 N.J. 567 (N.J. 1991)   Cited 62 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Describing a worker's additional employees, vehicles, and equipment as relevant to evaluating the C prong of the ABC test
  7. Standard Oil of Conn., Inc. v. Adm'r

    320 Conn. 611 (Conn. 2016)   Cited 16 times
    Reviewing case law from Connecticut and other states and listing relevant factors for part A
  8. Daw's Critical Care Registry, Inc. v. Department of Labor

    622 A.2d 518 (Conn. 1993)   Cited 27 times
    Characterizing Connecticut precedent relating to prong B of ABC test as limited
  9. People ex Rel. Price v. Sheffield Farms Co.

    225 N.Y. 25 (N.Y. 1918)   Cited 119 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Arguing that imprisonment for a crime that requires no mens rea would stretch the law regarding acts mala prohibita beyond its limitations
  10. Osborne v. Winter

    133 Cal.App. 664 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)   Cited 3 times
    In Osborne v. Winter (1933) 133 Cal.App.664, the appellate court affirmed a finding the appellant was liable under a predecessor statute to section 13007, noting "[I]t was plainly shown by other evidence that the fire had started 'right where [appellant] was raking', and that there was 'plenty of wind'.
  11. Section 1858 - Office of judge in construction of statute or instrument

    Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 1858   Cited 761 times
    Interpreting statutes
  12. Section 43:21-19 - Definitions

    N.J. Stat. § 43:21-19   Cited 173 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Defining "average weekly wage"
  13. Section 12:56-16.1 - Independent contractor status criteria

    N.J. Admin. Code § 12:56-16.1   Cited 2 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Implementing the WHL