§Why CasetextPricing

FRIENDS OF THE EEL RIVER v. NORTH COAST RAILROAD AUTHORITY (NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY)

Respondents, North Coast Railroad Authority and Board of Directors of North Coast Railroad Authority, and Real Party in Interest, Northwestern Pacific Railroad Company, Opposition

5 Cited authorities

  1. Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Fremont General Corp.

    148 Cal.App.4th 97 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 364 times
    Holding a net operating loss as intangible property

  2. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. City of West Palm Beach

    266 F.3d 1324 (11th Cir. 2001)   Cited 101 times
    Holding laws having the “effect of managing or governing rail transportation” preempted, “while permitting the continued application of laws having a more remote or incidental effect on rail transportation.”

  3. Coastside Fishing Club v. Cal. Fish & Game Comm'n

    215 Cal.App.4th 397 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013)   Cited 23 times
    Noting "[w]hether the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies applies in a given case is a legal question that we review de novo"

  4. Native Village of Eklutna v. Alaska R.R. Corp.

    87 P.3d 41 (Alaska 2004)   Cited 10 times
    Examining purpose of federal act to determine whether Congress intended to preempt all local and state regulation

  5. Section 10501 - General jurisdiction

    49 U.S.C. § 10501   Cited 558 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Assigning exclusive jurisdiction over "transportation by rail carriers" and "the construction ... operation ... of ... tracks" to the Surface Transportation Board