17 Cited authorities

  1. Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Ass'n

    505 U.S. 88 (1992)   Cited 762 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 653(b) prevents federal preemption of state tort law and worker's compensation schemes
  2. People v. Stanley

    10 Cal.4th 764 (Cal. 1995)   Cited 1,288 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding admission of evidence of a car arson as an offense that "involved an implied threat of violence against a person"
  3. Hughes v. Oklahoma

    441 U.S. 322 (1979)   Cited 578 times
    Holding that state regulations of intrastate wildlife are within dormant Commerce Clause
  4. Chabner v. United of Omaha Life Ins. Co.

    225 F.3d 1042 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 358 times
    Holding that the Unruh Act prohibits an insurance company from imposing unreasonable pricing differentials based on an applicant's disability
  5. Vega v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

    654 F. Supp. 2d 1104 (E.D. Cal. 2009)   Cited 217 times
    Holding that the Rule 8 requirement "applies to good claims as well as bad, and is the basis for dismissal independent of Rule 12(b)"
  6. Kodadek v. MTV Networks, Inc.

    152 F.3d 1209 (9th Cir. 1998)   Cited 126 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if deposit copies of a work accompanying an application for registration are not accurate copies of the work for which registration is sought, then the registration is invalid
  7. People v. Superior Court (Humberto S.)

    43 Cal.4th 737 (Cal. 2008)   Cited 74 times

    No. S149123. May 12, 2008. Appeal from the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. TJ15419, Mark R. Frazin, Juvenile Court Referee, Michael Nash, Judge. Steve Cooley, District Attorney, Lael R. Rubin, William Woods and Tracey Lopez, Deputy District Attorneys, for Petitioner. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Donald E. de Nicola, Deputy State Solicitor General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, and Kristofer Jorstad, Deputy

  8. Rose v. Bank of Am., N.A.

    57 Cal.4th 390 (Cal. 2013)   Cited 47 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that even the abolition of a private right of action in an underlying statute "does not amount to a bar against UCL claims" premised on that statute
  9. Industrial Truck Association, Inc. v. Henry

    125 F.3d 1305 (9th Cir. 1997)   Cited 55 times
    Explaining that court will find federal conflict preemption when "it is impossible to comply with both state and federal requirements"
  10. Washington Mutual Bank v. Superior Court

    95 Cal.App.4th 606 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 37 times
    Reciting history of adoption of section and stating that "[a]t the time Section 560.2 was issued, OTS advised that this `general lending preemption provision,' was simply restating `long-standing preemption principles applicable to federal savings associations, as reflected in earlier regulations, court cases, and numerous legal opinions issued by OTS and the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB), OTS's predecessor agency.'"
  11. Section 653 - Geographic applicability; judicial enforcement; applicability to existing standards; report to Congress on duplication and coordination of Federal laws; workmen's compensation law or common law or statutory rights, duties, or liabilities of employers and employees unaffected

    29 U.S.C. § 653   Cited 328 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Establishing that nothing in the OSHA statute "shall be construed to ... enlarge or diminish or affect in any other manner the common law or statutory rights, duties or liabilities of employers and employees under any law ..."
  12. Section 667 - State jurisdiction and plans

    29 U.S.C. § 667   Cited 158 times   2 Legal Analyses

    (a) Assertion of State standards in absence of applicable Federal standards Nothing in this chapter shall prevent any State agency or court from asserting jurisdiction under State law over any occupational safety or health issue with respect to which no standard is in effect under section 655 of this title. (b) Submission of State plan for development and enforcement of State standards to preempt applicable Federal standards Any State which, at any time, desires to assume responsibility for development

  13. § 1910.147 The control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout)

    29 C.F.R. § 1910.147   Cited 50 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Requiring employers to train employees on "energy control" concepts and skills