§Why CasetextPricing

SOLUS INDUSTRIAL INNOVATIONS v. S.C.

Petitioners’ Answer Brief on the Merits

22 Cited authorities

  1. Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Ass'n

    505 U.S. 88 (1992)   Cited 913 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "nonapproved state regulation of occupational safety and health issues for which a federal standard is in effect is impliedly preempted" by OSHA's standard

  2. People v. Stanley

    10 Cal.4th 764 (Cal. 1995)   Cited 2,237 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding admission of evidence of a car arson as an offense that "involved an implied threat of violence against a person"

  3. Silvas v. E*Trade Mortgage Corp.

    514 F.3d 1001 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 402 times
    Holding that claims for unfair advertising and unfair competition brought pursuant to California's consumer protection statute were preempted by § 560.2(b)

  4. Farm Raised Salmon Cases

    42 Cal.4th 1077 (Cal. 2008)   Cited 216 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Sherman Law violations may form the basis of a UCL claim

  5. People ex rel. Harris v. PAC Anchor Transportation, Inc.

    59 Cal.4th 772 (Cal. 2014)   Cited 174 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Finding that a UCL claim seeking injunctive relief, civil penalties, and restitution on the basis that defendants misclassified drivers and failed to take statutorily mandated actions including provision of workers compensation was not preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994

  6. Kodadek v. MTV Networks, Inc.

    152 F.3d 1209 (9th Cir. 1998)   Cited 148 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if deposit copies of a work accompanying an application for registration are not accurate copies of the work for which registration is sought, then the registration is invalid

  7. Bell v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

    87 Cal.App.4th 805 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001)   Cited 111 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that claims representatives are not exempt from the overtime pay provisions of California Wage Order No. 4

  8. Rose v. Bank of America, N.A.

    57 Cal.4th 390 (Cal. 2013)   Cited 62 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that even the abolition of a private right of action in an underlying statute "does not amount to a bar against UCL claims" premised on that statute

  9. Rojas v. Superior Court

    33 Cal.4th 407 (Cal. 2004)   Cited 80 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding California mediation privilege was not subject to “good cause” exception because only exceptions to mediation confidentiality were those expressly provided in statute

  10. Industrial Truck Association, Inc. v. Henry

    125 F.3d 1305 (9th Cir. 1997)   Cited 64 times
    Explaining that court will find federal conflict preemption when "it is impossible to comply with both state and federal requirements"

  11. Section 651 - Congressional statement of findings and declaration of purpose and policy

    29 U.S.C. § 651   Cited 1,500 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Noting the OSH Act arose from concern surrounding "personal injuries and illnesses arising out of work situations"

  12. Section 667 - State jurisdiction and plans

    29 U.S.C. § 667   Cited 182 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Providing for transfer of jurisdiction