18 Cited authorities

  1. Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Ass'n

    505 U.S. 88 (1992)   Cited 892 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "nonapproved state regulation of occupational safety and health issues for which a federal standard is in effect is impliedly preempted" by OSHA's standard
  2. Browning-Ferris Industries v. Kelco Disposal

    492 U.S. 257 (1989)   Cited 877 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Eighth Amendment applies "primarily, and perhaps exclusively, to criminal prosecutions and punishments" and does not apply to punitive damages in a civil suit
  3. Industrial Truck Association, Inc. v. Henry

    125 F.3d 1305 (9th Cir. 1997)   Cited 62 times
    Explaining that court will find federal conflict preemption when "it is impossible to comply with both state and federal requirements"
  4. Washington Mutual Bank v. Superior Court

    95 Cal.App.4th 606 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 41 times
    Holding that state statutory claims challenging preclosing interest charges on home loans are preempted by the Home Owner's Loan Act and the act's implementing regulations
  5. Solus Industrial Innovations, LLC v. Superior Court (The People)

    229 Cal.App.4th 1291 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014)   Cited 2 times   2 Legal Analyses

    G047661 09-22-2014 SOLUS INDUSTRIAL INNOVATIONS, LLC, et al., Petitioners, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Orange County, Respondent; The People, Real Party in Interest. Jones Day, Los Angeles, Brian A. Sun and Frederick D. Friedman, for Petitioners. No appearance for Respondent. Tony Rackauckas, District Attorney, and Kelly A. Roosevelt, Deputy District Attorney, for Real Party in Interest. Amy D. Martin, Pasadena, and Kathryn J. Woods, Los Angeles, for the Department of Industrial Relations Division of

  6. Kelly v. USS-Posco Industries

    101 F. App'x 182 (9th Cir. 2003)

    Argued and Submitted July 18, 2003. NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3) Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-98-04457-CRB. Debra L. Kelly, pro se, Guerneville, CA, Alan Gregory Wonderwheel, Esq., Santa Rosa, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Allan Steyer, Esq., Cassandra M. Hanley, Steyer, Lowenthal, Boodrookas, Alvarez & Smith, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Cory S

  7. California Lab. Federation v. Occupational Safety & Health Stds. Bd.

    221 Cal.App.3d 1547 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990)   Cited 10 times

    Docket No. A048574. July 12, 1990. Page 1548 COUNSEL Altshuler Berzon, Stephen P. Berzon, Michael Rubin, Charles P. Scully II, Donald C. Carroll, Ralph Santiago Abascal, Albert H. Meyerhoff, David B. Roe and Laurence Gold for Petitioners. Kroncik, Moskovitz, Tiedemann Girard, Charles A. Barrett, Janet K. Goldsmith, William E. Hvidsten and Stephen H. Goldberg for Respondent. OPINION SMITH, J. — I. Introduction In this case we consider whether respondent California Occupational Safety and Health Standards

  8. Section 666 - Civil and criminal penalties

    29 U.S.C. § 666   Cited 385 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Penalizing false statement in health and safety report required under this chapter
  9. Section 667 - State jurisdiction and plans

    29 U.S.C. § 667   Cited 181 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Providing for transfer of jurisdiction
  10. Section 17508 - False or misleading advertising claim

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17508   Cited 46 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Declaring it unlawful "to make any false or misleading advertising claim, including claims that purport to be based on factual, objective, or clinical evidence, compare the product's effectiveness or safety to that of other brands or products, or purport to be based on any fact"
  11. Section 6302 - Definitions

    Cal. Lab. Code § 6302   Cited 42 times   1 Legal Analyses

    As used in this division: (a) "Director" means the Director of Industrial Relations. (b) "Department" means the Department of Industrial Relations. (c) "Insurer" includes the State Compensation Insurance Fund and any private company, corporation, mutual association, and reciprocal or interinsurance exchange, authorized under the laws of this state to insure employers against liability for compensation under this part and under Division 4 (commencing with Section 3201), and any employer to whom a

  12. Section 6307 - Division power, jurisdiction and supervision

    Cal. Lab. Code § 6307   Cited 31 times

    The division has the power, jurisdiction, and supervision over every employment and place of employment in this state, which is necessary adequately to enforce and administer all laws and lawful standards and orders, or special orders requiring such employment and place of employment to be safe, and requiring the protection of the life, safety, and health of every employee in such employment or place of employment. Ca. Lab. Code § 6307 Repealed and added by Stats. 1973, Ch. 993.

  13. Section 6319 - Notice of citation or order and time to appeal; assessment of civil penalties

    Cal. Lab. Code § 6319   Cited 9 times

    (a) If, after an inspection or investigation, the division issues a citation pursuant to Section 6317 or an order pursuant to Section 6308, it shall, within a reasonable time after the termination of the inspection or investigation, notify the employer by certified mail of the citation or order, and that the employer has 15 working days from receipt of the notice within which to notify the appeals board that he or she wishes to contest the citation or order for any reason set forth in Section 6600

  14. Section 6317 - Issuance of citation to employer

    Cal. Lab. Code § 6317   Cited 9 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Discussing the Division's authority to issue citations
  15. Section 6428 - Civil penalty for violation of standard order or special order determined to be serious violation

    Cal. Lab. Code § 6428   Cited 4 times

    Any employer who violates any occupational safety or health standard, order, or special order, or Section 25910 of the Health and Safety Code, if that violation is a serious violation, shall be assessed a civil penalty of up to twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for each violation. Employers who do not have an operative injury prevention program shall receive no adjustment for good faith of the employer or history of previous violations as provided in paragraphs (3) and (4) of subdivision (c)

  16. Section 6427 - Civil penalty for violation of standard, order or special order determined not to be of serious nature

    Cal. Lab. Code § 6427   Cited 2 times

    (a) Any employer who violates any occupational safety or health standard, order, or special order, or Section 25910 of the Health and Safety Code, and the violation is specifically determined not to be of a serious nature, may be assessed a civil penalty of up to twelve thousand four hundred seventy-one dollars ($12,471) for each violation. (b) Commencing on January 1, 2018, and each January 1 thereafter, the maximum penalty amount specified in this section shall be increased based on the percentage

  17. Section 6430 - Failure to correct violation of standard, order or special order

    Cal. Lab. Code § 6430   Cited 1 times

    (a) Any employer who fails to correct a violation of any occupational safety or health standard, order, or special order, or Section 25910 of the Health and Safety Code, within the period permitted for its correction shall be assessed a civil penalty of not more than fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) for each day during which the failure or violation continues. (b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), for any employer who submits a signed statement affirming compliance with the abatement terms pursuant

  18. Section 1953.3 - General policies and procedures

    29 C.F.R. § 1953.3   Cited 1 times

    (a)Effectiveness of State plan changes under State law. Federal OSHA approval of a State plan under section 18(b) of the OSH Act in effect removes the barrier of Federal preemption, and permits the State to adopt and enforce State standards and other requirements regarding occupational safety or health issues regulated by OSHA. A State with an approved plan may modify or supplement the requirements contained in its plan, and may implement such requirements under State law, without prior approval