33 Cited authorities

  1. Batson v. Kentucky

    476 U.S. 79 (1986)   Cited 15,232 times   61 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Equal Protection Clause applies to the use of peremptory strikes
  2. Arizona v. Gant

    556 U.S. 332 (2009)   Cited 3,882 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a search incident to a lawful arrest is one conducted "as long as the administrative processes incident to the arrest and custody have not been completed."
  3. Riley v. California

    573 U.S. 373 (2014)   Cited 2,601 times   90 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employee had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the call records and text messages contained on a cell phone owned by his employer because he "had a right to exclude others from using the phone" and explaining that "a property interest in the item searched is only one factor in the analysis, and lack thereof is not dispositive"
  4. United States v. Leon

    468 U.S. 897 (1984)   Cited 10,229 times   72 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when a warrant is "subsequently invalidated," suppression is not necessary so long as the warrant was issued by a neutral magistrate and the officers' reliance on the warrant was objectively reasonable
  5. Davis v. U.S.

    564 U.S. 229 (2011)   Cited 2,226 times   47 Legal Analyses
    Holding "newly announced rules of constitutional criminal procedure 'must apply retroactively to all cases, state or federal, pending on direct review or not yet final, with no exception.'"
  6. Atwater v. City of Lago Vista

    532 U.S. 318 (2001)   Cited 1,874 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Fourth Amendment does not bar a warrantless arrest for "even a very minor criminal offense" that the officer has probable cause to believe the individual committed in his presence
  7. Griffith v. Kentucky

    479 U.S. 314 (1987)   Cited 3,328 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that on direct review, a new constitutional rule must be applied retroactively "to all cases, state or federal"
  8. New York v. Belton

    453 U.S. 454 (1981)   Cited 3,123 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when an officer has made a lawful custodial arrest of the occupant of an automobile, he may, as a contemporaneous incident of that arrest, search the interior of that automobile
  9. Virginia v. Moore

    553 U.S. 164 (2008)   Cited 1,035 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an officer's violation of state law arrest rules did not render an arrest unconstitutional because "it is not the province of the Fourth Amendment to enforce state law"
  10. United States v. Robinson

    414 U.S. 218 (1973)   Cited 3,358 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that law enforcement officers are authorized to conduct a full search of every lawful custodial arrestee