18 Cited authorities

  1. In re Alexis E.

    171 Cal.App.4th 438 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 1,119 times
    Finding a risk to the children via exposure to secondhand marijuana smoke
  2. People v. Giordano

    42 Cal.4th 644 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 892 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a surviving spouse may receive lost economic support as restitution despite the fact that such recovery is not specifically enumerated
  3. People v. Carbajal

    10 Cal.4th 1114 (Cal. 1995)   Cited 1,170 times
    Holding probationer convicted of hit-and-run could be ordered to pay vehicle damage not caused by criminal act of leaving scene of accident
  4. People v. Harvey

    25 Cal.3d 754 (Cal. 1979)   Cited 1,943 times
    Holding that a court may not consider facts underlying a dismissed count for purposes of aggravating or enhancing a defendant's sentence
  5. People v. Lent

    15 Cal.3d 481 (Cal. 1975)   Cited 1,697 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a probationer who agreed to a search term cannot avoid an imminent search by refusing law enforcement permission to conduct it
  6. Hagberg v. California Federal Bank FSB

    32 Cal.4th 350 (Cal. 2004)   Cited 395 times
    Holding that civilians who provide information leading to an arrest cannot be held liable for false arrest
  7. People v. Lai

    138 Cal.App.4th 1227 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 274 times
    Finding of planning upheld despite the fact that the defendant was uneducated, illiterate, and "not a particularly sophisticated person"
  8. Corenbaum v. Lampkin

    215 Cal.App.4th 1308 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013)   Cited 122 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a defendant's failure to comply with the subpoena for financial records in the punitive phase of the trial, precludes the defendant from challenging the punitive damage awards based on lack of evidence of his financial condition or insufficiency of the evidence to establish his ability to pay the amount awarded
  9. People v. Woods

    161 Cal.App.4th 1045 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 122 times
    Reversing restitution order under section 1202.4 as to defendant convicted of violating section 32
  10. People v. Rubics

    136 Cal.App.4th 452 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 94 times
    Affirming restitution award for funeral expenses where the defendant pleaded guilty to hit and run causing death because one of the purposes of the hit and run statute "is to make a driver face up to taking responsibility for the damages caused by the accident and the effect on society when he or she flees the scene without taking responsibility for that accident"
  11. Section 28

    Cal. Const. art. I § 28   Cited 2,121 times
    Granting crime victims the right "[t]o reasonable notice of all public proceedings, including delinquency proceedings, upon request, at which the defendant and the prosecutor are entitled to be present"
  12. Rule 8.500 - Petition for review

    Cal. R. 8.500   Cited 337 times

    (a)Right to file a petition, answer, or reply (1) A party may file a petition in the Supreme Court for review of any decision of the Court of Appeal, including any interlocutory order, except the denial of a transfer of a case within the appellate jurisdiction of the superior court. (2) A party may file an answer responding to the issues raised in the petition. In the answer, the party may ask the court to address additional issues if it grants review. (3) The petitioner may file a reply to the answer

  13. Rule 8.71 - Electronic filing

    Cal. R. 8.71

    (a) Mandatory electronic filing Except as otherwise provided by these rules, the Supreme Court Rules Regarding Electronic Filing, or court order, all parties are required to file all documents electronically in the reviewing court. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2020.) (b)Self-represented parties (1) Self-represented parties are exempt from the requirement to file documents electronically. (2) A self-represented party may agree to file documents electronically. By electronically filing any