18 Cited authorities

Marks v. United States
430 U.S. 188 (1977) Cited 2,097 times 31 Legal Analyses
Holding that due process is violated if the trial court instructs the jury based on the current interpretation of a statute, rather than the interpretation that controlled at the time of the allegedly criminal acts
Miller v. California
413 U.S. 15 (1973) Cited 2,125 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that a statute regulating obscene speech must be limited to works that depict or describe sexual conduct "which, taken as a whole, appeal to the prurient interest in sex, which portray sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, and which, taken as a whole, do not have serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value"
Bouie v. City of Columbia
378 U.S. 347 (1964) Cited 1,495 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding that extending South Carolina's trespassing statute to remaining on another's property after being asked to leave was inconsistent with the law's text barring only "entry" upon another's property
Memoirs v. Massachusetts
383 U.S. 413 (1966) Cited 618 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding that a work's artistic merit does not depend on the presence of a single explicit scene.
Gregory v. Helvering
293 U.S. 465 (1935) Cited 1,443 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that when the form of a transaction does not comport with its substance, the substance of the transaction controls for tax liability purposes
Cedars-Sinai Med. Ctr. v. Sup. Ct., Los Angeles Cty
18 Cal.4th 1 (Cal. 1998) Cited 317 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that "there is no tort remedy for the intentional spoliation of evidence by a party to the cause of action to which the spoliated evidence is relevant, in cases in which, as here, the spoliation victim knows or should have known of the alleged spoliation before the trial or other decision on the merits of the underlying action."
Fisher v. City of Berkeley
37 Cal.3d 644 (Cal. 1984) Cited 224 times 1 Legal Analyses
Upholding rent withholding procedures
Hotel Employees Restaurant Emps. Int. Un. v. Davis
21 Cal.4th 585 (Cal. 1999) Cited 86 times
Holding that the invalid portions of a law were not volitionally separable despite the presence of a severability clause
Trinkle v. California State Lottery
105 Cal.App.4th 1401 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003) Cited 45 times
Treating §§ 330b & 330.1 as identical
Cole v. Rush
45 Cal.2d 345 (Cal. 1955) Cited 150 times
Noting the Legislature's failure to change the law despite making numerous other statutory changes "is indicative of an intent to leave the law as it stands in the aspects not amended"
Section 19
Cal. Const. art. IV § 19 Cited 68 times
Notwithstanding subdivision (e), "slot machines, lottery games, and banking and percentage card games are hereby permitted to be conducted and operated on tribal lands. . . ."

PEOPLE v. GREWAL

18 Cited authorities

Holding that due process is violated if the trial court instructs the jury based on the current interpretation of a statute, rather than the interpretation that controlled at the time of the allegedly criminal acts

Holding that extending South Carolina's trespassing statute to remaining on another's property after being asked to leave was inconsistent with the law's text barring only "entry" upon another's property

Finding that a work's artistic merit does not depend on the presence of a single explicit scene.

Holding that when the form of a transaction does not comport with its substance, the substance of the transaction controls for tax liability purposes

Upholding rent withholding procedures

Holding that the invalid portions of a law were not volitionally separable despite the presence of a severability clause

Treating §§ 330b & 330.1 as identical

Noting the Legislature's failure to change the law despite making numerous other statutory changes "is indicative of an intent to leave the law as it stands in the aspects not amended"

Notwithstanding subdivision (e), "slot machines, lottery games, and banking and percentage card games are hereby permitted to be conducted and operated on tribal lands. . . ."