182 Cal.App.3d 185 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986) Cited 48 times
In Santana, the striking of the prior conviction allegation did not "wipe out prior convictions" or prevent them from being considered in connection with future convictions.
222 Cal.App.3d 477 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990) Cited 15 times
In Holland v. Dave Altman's R.V. Center (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 477, 271 Cal.Rptr. 706, the Court of Appeal addressed the meaning of the term “stay” in section 583.340(b).