§Why CasetextPricing

POOLE v. ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY (and consolidated case)

Respondent’s Petition for Review

21 Cited authorities

  1. Pitchess v. Superior Court

    11 Cal.3d 531 (Cal. 1974)   Cited 2,716 times
    Concluding defendant made a good faith showing in support of his discovery motion where "the information which defendant seeks may have considerable significance to the preparation of his defense, and the documents have been requested with adequate specificity to preclude the possibility that defendant is engaging in a 'fishing expedition' "

  2. People v. Gonzales

    52 Cal.4th 254 (Cal. 2011)   Cited 607 times
    Finding sufficient evidence of intent to aid and abet murder or assault with a deadly weapon naturally and probably causing the murder where both defendants urged driver to turn car around to confront victims, exited the car together, had just committed an armed robbery, and where the codefendant was armed and knew the perpetrator was armed

  3. Shamblin v. Brattain

    44 Cal.3d 474 (Cal. 1988)   Cited 751 times
    Determining credibility of declaration supporting relief from default

  4. Winograd v. American Broadcasting Co.

    68 Cal.App.4th 624 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 525 times
    In Winograd, the plaintiff sought damages for an automobile collision caused by the defendant's employee while the employee was engaged in a business task for the defendant.

  5. Bowers v. Bernards

    150 Cal.App.3d 870 (Cal. Ct. App. 1984)   Cited 844 times
    Reviewing court considers entire record

  6. Kuhn v. Department of General Services

    22 Cal.App.4th 1627 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 474 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Applying the substantial evidence test to appellate review of State Personnel Board determinations

  7. McRae v. Dept. of Correc

    142 Cal.App.4th 377 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 261 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that filed letters, a memorandum of instruction, and an investigation were not adverse employment actions because they did not materially affect the terms, conditions, or privileges of employment

  8. Doe v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Cashel & Emly

    177 Cal.App.4th 209 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 194 times
    Deciding substantial evidence issue in the alternative after deeming the issue waived because appellant failed to set forth all the relevant evidence

  9. People v. Louis

    42 Cal.3d 969 (Cal. 1986)   Cited 202 times
    Finding prejudice where the record failed to dispel beyond a reasonable doubt the possibility that the defendant's testimony was " 'impelled by the erroneous introduction' " of inadmissible evidence

  10. Alliance for a Better Downtown Millbrae v. Wade

    108 Cal.App.4th 123 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 55 times

    A099453 Filed April 25, 2003 APPEAL from San Mateo County Superior Court, Robert D. Foiles, Judge. Hanson, Bridgett, Marcus, Vlahos Rudy and Michael A. Duncheon, Joan L. Cassman and Stephen B. Peck for Appellants. Fogarty Watson and Mark C. Watson and Dennis Scott Zell, Janet Fogarty Associates and Dennis Scott Zell for Respondents. GEMELLO, J. Does a city elections official have authority to refuse to certify an initiative petition based on extrinsic evidence relating to the manner of its circulation