19 Cited authorities

  1. Johnson v. State

    69 Cal.2d 782 (Cal. 1968)   Cited 475 times
    Holding that, while a decision to parole is a basic policy decision, a parole officer’s subsequent decision as to what warnings to give to foster parents was "a determination at the lowest, ministerial rung of official action" and not entitled to immunity
  2. Haggis v. City of Los Angeles

    22 Cal.4th 490 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 153 times
    Stating that the four causes of action brought by the plaintiff were for breach of mandatory duties pursuant to § 815.6
  3. Guzman v. County of Monterey

    46 Cal.4th 887 (Cal. 2009)   Cited 109 times
    Finding no liability under the Safe Drinking Water Act based on an implied duty to notify customers, where the only directive imposed by the statute was a duty to review a water system's monitoring reports
  4. De Villers v. County of San Diego

    156 Cal.App.4th 238 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 114 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding "no relevant case law approving a claim for direct liability based on a public entity's allegedly negligent hiring and supervision practices"
  5. Morris v. County of Marin

    18 Cal.3d 901 (Cal. 1977)   Cited 229 times
    Discussing the difference between “mandatory” and “discretionary” acts for public entities, and contrasting the liability with public employees, which were made to be liable similarly to private persons
  6. Landeros v. Flood

    17 Cal.3d 399 (Cal. 1976)   Cited 215 times
    Holding a violation of the statute's mandate to report may constitute negligence per se
  7. Superior Court v. County of Mendocino

    13 Cal.4th 45 (Cal. 1996)   Cited 111 times
    Upholding facial validity of a statutory designation of one or more unpaid furlough days on which trial courts shall not be in session, because the statute would not necessarily defeat or materially impair a court's fulfillment of its constitutional duties
  8. Creason v. State Department of Health Services

    18 Cal.4th 623 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 65 times
    Holding Dept. of Health Services had substantial discretion to formulate and report appropriate testing standards for hypothyroidism
  9. Alejo v. City of Alhambra

    75 Cal.App.4th 1180 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 62 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that where the defendant officer failed to investigate or cross-report allegations of child abuse, the plaintiffs were entitled to prove by expert testimony that a reasonably prudent social worker would have responded to reported child abuse in a way that would have prevented subsequent injuries
  10. Ortega v. Sacramento County Dept. of Health & Human Services

    161 Cal.App.4th 713 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 30 times
    Finding that § 820.2 immunity applied to claims based on social workers' alleged failure to gather the pertinent facts before releasing child to her father, who then stabbed child in the heart and lung