28 Cited authorities

  1. Palma v. U. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.

    36 Cal.3d 171 (Cal. 1984)   Cited 1,204 times
    Finding a triable issue of fact as to existence of a duty when a large commercial truck left unlocked with the keys in it overnight in a high crime industrial area was stolen and subsequently struck and injured plaintiff
  2. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California

    17 Cal.3d 425 (Cal. 1976)   Cited 827 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are threatened with physical harm by a patient
  3. Chavez v. City of Los Angles

    47 Cal.4th 970 (Cal. 2010)   Cited 287 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a reduced fee award is appropriate where a claimant achieves only limited success
  4. In re C.H.

    53 Cal.4th 94 (Cal. 2011)   Cited 109 times
    Construing Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 731, subd., 733, subd. (c)
  5. Sierra Club v. Superior Court (County of Orange)

    57 Cal.4th 157 (Cal. 2013)   Cited 81 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Sierra Club, a CPRA statute specifically excluded" '[c]omputer software' from the definition of a public record" and defined" 'computer software'" as including "computer mapping systems."
  6. Filarsky v. Superior Court

    28 Cal.4th 419 (Cal. 2002)   Cited 103 times
    Holding that a city is not entitled to declaratory relief regarding its disclosure obligations under the California Public Records Act, but not deciding whether a third party —such as the Union here—is entitled to such relief
  7. California Assn. of Health Facilities v. Department of Health Services

    16 Cal.4th 284 (Cal. 1997)   Cited 89 times
    Concluding that statute incorporated common law liability principles without even inquiring whether the conduct prohibited by the statute — health and safety violations by nursing facilities — had been actionable at common law
  8. Kizer v. County of San Mateo

    53 Cal.3d 139 (Cal. 1991)   Cited 97 times
    In Kizer, the State Department of Health Services issued class AA and A citations under section 1424 to a long-term health care facility that was licensed and operated by the County of San Mateo ("County").
  9. San Leandro Teachers Assn. v. Governing Bd. of San Leandro Unified School Dist.

    46 Cal.4th 822 (Cal. 2009)   Cited 44 times
    Describing three categories under California and Federal case law
  10. Los Angeles Times v. Alameda Corridor

    88 Cal.App.4th 1381 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001)   Cited 50 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In L.A. Times, the municipal agency also argued that the order denying attorney fees was not an appealable postjudgment order because the underlying order was not appealable.
  11. Section 3

    Cal. Const. art. I § 3   Cited 296 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Creating constitutional right of access to public agency records and calling for strict construction of statutes limiting such access
  12. Section 76721 - Posting of Citations

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 22 § 76721

    (a) Each citation for a class "A" violation which has become final, or a copy or copies thereof, shall be prominently posted by the licensee until the violation is corrected to the satisfaction of the Department, up to a maximum of 120 days. The citation or copy shall be posted in a place or places in plain view of the clients in the facility, persons visiting those clients and persons who inquire about placement in the facility. (b) Each citation for class "A" or class "B" violations which has become

  13. Rule 8.493 - Costs

    Cal. R. 8.493   Cited 328 times

    (a)Award of costs (1) Except in a criminal or juvenile or other proceeding in which a party is entitled to court-appointed counsel: (A) Unless otherwise ordered by the court under (B), the prevailing party in an original proceeding is entitled to costs if the court resolves the proceeding by written opinion after issuing an alternative writ, an order to show cause, or a peremptory writ in the first instance. (B) In the interests of justice, the court may also award or deny costs as it deems proper