Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Bd. of Equalization

Holding that “administrative interpretation ... will be accorded great respect by the courts and will be followed it not clearly erroneous”

Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of University of California

Holding that an EIR must include an analysis of the environmental effects of future expansion if it is a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the initial project and the future expansion will be significant in that it will likely change the scope or nature of the initial project or its environmental effects

Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance Plastering, Inc.

Denying request for judicial notice for failure to show the "Fact Sheet" was communicated to the Legislature as a whole

Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. Guardino

Discussing statewide right to initiative

Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of Bakersfield

In Bakersfield, the real parties in interest were private developers of two shopping mall projects, and the plaintiff challenged the city's project approvals based on inadequacy of the EIRs. (Id. at pp. 1194-1195.)

San Lorenzo Valley Community Advocates for Responsible Education v. San Lorenzo Valley Unified School Dist.

In San Lorenzo Valley Community Advocates for Responsible Education v. San Lorenzo Valley USD (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 1356, 1368, 44 Cal.Rptr.3d 128, the issue was the decision to close two elementary schools.

Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority

Holding that “[w]hile an agency has the discretion under some circumstances to omit environmental analysis of impacts on existing conditions and instead use only a baseline of projected future conditions, existing conditions ‘will normally constitute the baseline physical conditions by which a lead agency determines whether an impact is significant’ ”

Marina Point, Ltd. v. Wolfson

Holding that apartment complex could not, under the Unruh Act, prohibit families with children

Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of Equalization

In Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of Equalization, 51 Cal.2d 640, the court states at pages 645, 646 [ 335 P.2d 672]: "It [i.e. the definition of sale quoted] coincides with the common-law definition of a `sale' and is substantially the same as that used in the Uniform Sales Act.

City of Long Beach v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist.

In Long Beach, the court considered the argument that an EIR addressing the proposed construction of a high school to serve over 1,800 students was insufficient because it failed to discuss the project's "cumulative impacts on air quality and traffic 'and in turn, on staff and student health' " in light of already-existing emissions from nearby freeways.

Section 14010 - Standards for School Site Selection