39 Cited authorities

People v. Wende
25 Cal.3d 436 (Cal. 1979) Cited 21,131 times 2 Legal Analyses
Finding that an Anders withdrawal may secure an appellant more comprehensive review by the appellate court
People v. Carmony
33 Cal.4th 367 (Cal. 2004) Cited 3,235 times
Holding that the Court of Appeal erred in reversing a trial court's ruling denying a request to strike prior convictions because the appellate court "simply disagreed with the [trial] court's weighing of [the relevant] factors"
Kwikset Corp. v. Superior Court
51 Cal.4th 310 (Cal. 2011) Cited 1,562 times 27 Legal Analyses
Holding "the standards for establishing standing under section 17204 and eligibility for restitution under section 17203 are wholly distinct"
People v. Park
56 Cal.4th 782 (Cal. 2013) Cited 453 times
Finding that a felony wobbler reduced to a misdemeanor would count as a prior felony conviction for purposes of a sentencing enhancement under Cal.Penal Code § 667(d), but would not count as a prior felony conviction for purposes of a sentencing enhancement under Cal.Penal Code § 667
People v. Superior Court (Kaulick)
215 Cal.App.4th 1279 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013) Cited 445 times 2 Legal Analyses
Finding People have due process right to notice and opportunity to be heard on issue of danger to public at such hearing
People v. McGee
38 Cal.4th 682 (Cal. 2006) Cited 487 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the trial court's inquiry into whether a prior conviction qualified as a “serious felony” for purposes of California's Three Strikes law does not violate the federal constitutional right to a jury determination for facts increasing sentence
Robert L. v. Superior Court of Orange County
30 Cal.4th 894 (Cal. 2003) Cited 442 times
Rejecting an argument the electorate intended for an existing statute to limit the scope of a statute enacted by initiative when the statute enacted by initiative did not refer to the existing statute or mirror the existing statute's language
People v. Birkett
21 Cal.4th 226 (Cal. 1999) Cited 393 times
Reversing order to divert portions of restitution award from victims of auto theft to victim's insurers, because "victim was entitled to receive from the probationer the full amount of the loss caused by the crime, regardless of whether, in the exercise of prudence, the victim had purchased private insurance that covered some or all of the same losses"
People v. Acosta
29 Cal.4th 105 (Cal. 2002) Cited 357 times
Holding that California Penal Code § 667 requires that a 5-year term enhancement applies where a defendant's prior conviction qualifies as a strike
People v. Totari
28 Cal.4th 876 (Cal. 2002) Cited 342 times
Holding denial of motion to vacate conviction appealable under section 1237, subdivision (b), because basis of motion was noncitizen defendant's substantial right to complete advisement of immigration consequences prior to entry of plea

TEAL v. S.C.

39 Cited authorities

Finding that an Anders withdrawal may secure an appellant more comprehensive review by the appellate court

Holding that the Court of Appeal erred in reversing a trial court's ruling denying a request to strike prior convictions because the appellate court "simply disagreed with the [trial] court's weighing of [the relevant] factors"

Holding "the standards for establishing standing under section 17204 and eligibility for restitution under section 17203 are wholly distinct"

Finding that a felony wobbler reduced to a misdemeanor would count as a prior felony conviction for purposes of a sentencing enhancement under Cal.Penal Code § 667(d), but would not count as a prior felony conviction for purposes of a sentencing enhancement under Cal.Penal Code § 667

Finding People have due process right to notice and opportunity to be heard on issue of danger to public at such hearing

Holding that the trial court's inquiry into whether a prior conviction qualified as a “serious felony” for purposes of California's Three Strikes law does not violate the federal constitutional right to a jury determination for facts increasing sentence

Rejecting an argument the electorate intended for an existing statute to limit the scope of a statute enacted by initiative when the statute enacted by initiative did not refer to the existing statute or mirror the existing statute's language

Holding that California Penal Code § 667 requires that a 5-year term enhancement applies where a defendant's prior conviction qualifies as a strike

Holding denial of motion to vacate conviction appealable under section 1237, subdivision (b), because basis of motion was noncitizen defendant's substantial right to complete advisement of immigration consequences prior to entry of plea