§Why CasetextPricing

PEOPLE v. SMITH

Respondent’s Reply to Supplemental Brief

7 Cited authorities

  1. The People v. McCoy

    25 Cal.4th 1111 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 1,111 times
    Recognizing that “[w]hen two or more persons commit a crime together, both may act in part as the actual perpetrator and in part as the aider and abettor of the other, who also acts in part as an actual perpetrator”

  2. People v. Prettyman

    14 Cal.4th 248 (Cal. 1996)   Cited 1,108 times
    Holding that CALJIC 3.01 and 3.02 which the judge also gave at Solis' trial "[do] not withdraw an element from the jury's determination or otherwise interject an impermissible presumption into the deliberative process"

  3. People v. Santana

    56 Cal.4th 999 (Cal. 2013)   Cited 118 times
    In Santana, we considered the jury instructions for the crime of mayhem, which courts have held to include great bodily injury as an element.

  4. People v. Luparello

    187 Cal.App.3d 410 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986)   Cited 77 times
    Finding a lack of prejudice despite prosecutor's misconduct in a nongang case by eliciting testimony about the violent activities of the appellant's gang

  5. People v. Brigham

    216 Cal.App.3d 1039 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989)   Cited 57 times
    Rejecting argument that the "People's election to prosecute a case solely as an aiding and abetting crime, which case is equally susceptible of a conspiracy prosecution, remove[d] unfairly the conspiracy defenses he would otherwise assert"

  6. People v. Dayan

    34 Cal.App.4th 707 (Cal. Ct. App. 1995)   Cited 16 times
    In Dayan, the court upheld the defendant's conviction for misdemeanor sexual battery for intentionally and unlawfully groping women in his dental office.

  7. Rule 8.71 - Electronic filing

    Cal. R. 8.71

    (a) Mandatory electronic filing Except as otherwise provided by these rules, the Supreme Court Rules Regarding Electronic Filing, or court order, all parties are required to file all documents electronically in the reviewing court. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2020.) (b)Self-represented parties (1) Self-represented parties are exempt from the requirement to file documents electronically. (2) A self-represented party may agree to file documents electronically. By electronically filing any