§Why CasetextPricing

PEOPLE v. SMITH

Appellant’s Supplemental Brief

7 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Chiu

    59 Cal.4th 155 (Cal. 2014)   Cited 1,100 times
    Holding that, as a matter of state law, an aider and abettor may not be convicted of first degree premeditated murder under the natural and probable consequences doctrine

  2. People v. Favor

    54 Cal.4th 868 (Cal. 2012)   Cited 233 times
    Acknowledging distinction between principal and perpetrator under California criminal law

  3. People v. Croy

    41 Cal.3d 1 (Cal. 1985)   Cited 252 times
    In People v. Croy, supra, 41 Cal.3d 1, we set forth the principles of the "natural and probable consequences" doctrine as applied to aiders and abettors: "[An aider and abettor] is guilty not only of the offense he intended to facilitate or encourage, but also of any reasonably foreseeable offense committed by the person he aids and abets.... [¶] It follows that a defendant whose liability is predicated on his status as an aider and abettor need not have intended to encourage or facilitate the particular offense ultimately committed by the perpetrator.

  4. People v. Luparello

    187 Cal.App.3d 410 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986)   Cited 77 times
    Finding a lack of prejudice despite prosecutor's misconduct in a nongang case by eliciting testimony about the violent activities of the appellant's gang

  5. People v. Brigham

    216 Cal.App.3d 1039 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989)   Cited 57 times
    Rejecting argument that the "People's election to prosecute a case solely as an aiding and abetting crime, which case is equally susceptible of a conspiracy prosecution, remove[d] unfairly the conspiracy defenses he would otherwise assert"

  6. People v. Anderson

    233 Cal.App.3d 1646 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)   Cited 34 times
    Affirming Cabaltero’s validity

  7. Rule 8.520 - Briefs by parties and amici curiae; judicial notice

    Cal. R. 8.520   Cited 3,160 times

    (a)Parties' briefs; time to file (1) Within 30 days after the Supreme Court files the order of review, the petitioner must serve and file in that court either an opening brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (2) Within 30 days after the petitioner files its brief or the time to do so expires, the opposing party must serve and file either an answer brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (3) The petitioner may file a reply brief on the merits or