§Why CasetextPricing

WEBB v. SPECIAL ELECTRIC COMPANY

Respondent’s Petition for Review

65 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Gardeley

    14 Cal.4th 605 (Cal. 1996)   Cited 2,118 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding it proper for prosecutor to give gang expert "a `hypothetical based on the facts of the assault in this case on Edward Bruno by three Family Crip members, ask[ing] [gang expert] if in his expert opinion an attack as described would be "gang-related activity"

  2. Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.

    194 Cal.App.4th 939 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 886 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that party challenging good faith had the burden of raising the issue of settlor's financial condition and presenting evidence of such

  3. Reeves v. Hanlon

    33 Cal.4th 1140 (Cal. 2004)   Cited 291 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding "a plaintiff may recover damages for intentional interference with an at-will employment relation under the same California standard applicable to claims for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage"

  4. Ladd v. County of San Mateo

    12 Cal.4th 913 (Cal. 1996)   Cited 364 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stating that the elements of a cause of action for negligence are a legal duty; (b) breach of such legal duty; and (c) that the breach proximately caused the resulting injury

  5. In re Merrick V.

    122 Cal.App.4th 235 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 282 times
    In Merrick V., the grandmother assumed the daily role of a parent for her two-year-old twin grandchildren since birth, as well as for her 12-year-old grandson.

  6. O'Neil v. Crane Co.

    53 Cal.4th 335 (Cal. 2012)   Cited 201 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that product manufacturer is not liable under any theory for harm caused by a third party's products

  7. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.

    59 Cal.2d 57 (Cal. 1963)   Cited 868 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding a manufacturer's liability should be imposed irrespective of fault

  8. Johnson v. American Standard, Inc.

    43 Cal.4th 56 (Cal. 2008)   Cited 195 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding defense applicable to both types of claims

  9. Sweatman v. Department of Veterans Affairs

    25 Cal.4th 62 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 211 times
    In Sweatman, a veteran had purchased a home through the Cal-Vet program pursuant to a contract that required the buyer to make installment payments to the Department of Veterans Affairs.

  10. Cornette v. Dept. of Transportation

    26 Cal.4th 63 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 201 times
    Concluding that the employer's withholding from an employee's pay amounts to cover the cost of workers' compensation coverage was a failure to secure coverage that, in turn, permitted the employee to bring a civil action for damages

  11. Section 13

    Cal. Const. art. VI § 13   Cited 4,515 times
    Requiring a "miscarriage of justice"

  12. Rule 8.124 - Appendixes

    Cal. R. 8.124   Cited 412 times

    (a)Notice of election (1) Unless the superior court orders otherwise on a motion served and filed within 10 days after the notice of election is served, this rule governs if: (A) The appellant elects to use an appendix under this rule in the notice designating the record on appeal under rule 8.121; or (B) The respondent serves and files a notice in the superior court electing to use an appendix under this rule within 10 days after the appellant's notice designating the record on appeal is filed and

  13. Rule 8.108 - Extending the time to appeal

    Cal. R. 8.108   Cited 380 times

    (a) Extension of time This rule operates only to extend the time to appeal otherwise prescribed in rule 8.104(a); it does not shorten the time to appeal. If the normal time to appeal stated in rule 8.104(a) is longer than the time provided in this rule, the time to appeal stated in rule 8.104(a) governs. (Subd (a) adopted effective January 1, 2008.) (b) Motion for new trial If any party serves and files a valid notice of intention to move for a new trial, the following extensions of time apply: (1)

  14. Rule 8.122 - Clerk's transcript

    Cal. R. 8.122   Cited 248 times

    (a) Designation (1) A notice designating documents to be included in a clerk's transcript must identify each designated document by its title and filing date or, if the filing date is not available, the date it was signed. The notice may specify portions of designated documents that are not to be included in the transcript. For minute orders or instructions, it is sufficient to collectively designate all minute orders or all minute orders entered between specified dates, or all written jury instructions