§Why CasetextPricing

JOHNSON v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Real Party in Interest, The People, Reply Brief on the Merits

12 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Hofsheier

    37 Cal.4th 1185 (Cal. 2006)   Cited 664 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding an equal protection violation as to a defendant convicted of oral copulation with a 16 year old

  2. People v. Flannel

    25 Cal.3d 668 (Cal. 1979)   Cited 977 times
    Abrogating Sedeno's requirement that jury instructions must be given whenever any evidence is presented, no matter how weak

  3. People v. Morante

    20 Cal.4th 403 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 390 times
    In Morante, the court noted that "[i]t is well established that one may become criminally liable for possession for sale or for transportation of a controlled substance, based upon either actual or constructive possession of the substance.

  4. People v. Picklesimer

    48 Cal.4th 330 (Cal. 2010)   Cited 265 times
    Holding that claims under Hofsheier by defendants no longer in custody must be brought by a petition for writ of mandate

  5. Cedars-Sinai Med. Ctr. v. Sup. Ct., Los Angeles Cty

    18 Cal.4th 1 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 318 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "there is no tort remedy for the intentional spoliation of evidence by a party to the cause of action to which the spoliated evidence is relevant, in cases in which, as here, the spoliation victim knows or should have known of the alleged spoliation before the trial or other decision on the merits of the underlying action."

  6. People v. Thornton

    11 Cal.3d 738 (Cal. 1974)   Cited 383 times
    In Thornton, the defendant confronted his victim in a single-room laundromat and, in the course of a sexual assault, dragged her to the rear of the facility.

  7. People v. Castellanos

    21 Cal.4th 785 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 173 times
    Holding that a similar California retrospective registration requirement does not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause

  8. People v. Montes

    112 Cal.App.4th 1543 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 110 times
    Reversing conviction for attempted voluntary manslaughter where reasonable probability jurors based verdict on defendant's conscious disregard for life

  9. People v. Ranscht

    173 Cal.App.4th 1369 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 60 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Disagreeing with majority's conclusion that an express limitation placed by our Supreme Court on a prior holding was dictum

  10. People v. Manchel

    163 Cal.App.4th 1108 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 46 times
    In Manchel, a 29-year-old defendant pleaded no contest to oral copulation of a 15-year-old girl, in violation of section 288a, subdivision (b)(2).