§Why CasetextPricing

CALIFORNIA CHARTER SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Respondent’s Reply Brief on the Merits

28 Cited authorities

  1. Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.

    14 Cal.4th 434 (Cal. 1996)   Cited 838 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Adopting a “substantial nexus or connection” approach in applying the California long-arm statute and, in rejecting other approaches, questioning the wisdom “of importing a causation test from tort law to measure a matter that is fundamentally one of relationship and fairness rather than causation”

  2. People v. Cain

    10 Cal.4th 1 (Cal. 1995)   Cited 647 times
    Finding that the trial court "correctly instructed the jury that the intent necessary to find defendant guilty of first degree murder under the felony-murder theory was a specific intent to commit one or more of the felonies underlying the charge" in a case where the crimes were committed in 1986, during the Carlos window

  3. Doe v. City of Los Angeles

    42 Cal.4th 531 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 257 times
    Holding courts construing California statutes "may not broaden or narrow the scope of the provision by reading into it language that does not appear in it or reading out of it language that does."

  4. California Teachers Assn. v. Governing Bd. of Rialto Unified School Dist.

    14 Cal.4th 627 (Cal. 1997)   Cited 344 times
    Describing the judicial role of construing statutes consistent with their plain meaning and other indicia of legislative intent

  5. Price v. Starbucks Corp.

    192 Cal.App.4th 1136 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 139 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding "[b]ecause the underlying causes of action fail, the derivative . . . PAGA claims also fail"

  6. Filip v. Bucurenciu

    129 Cal.App.4th 825 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 150 times
    Holding court has “discretion in fashioning relief” under UFTA

  7. People v. Shabazz

    38 Cal.4th 55 (Cal. 2006)   Cited 138 times
    Affirming imposition of both punishments upon the shooter in a gang-related murder but only analyzing whether the sentence was permissible under § 12022.53, subd. (j)

  8. Herrera v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

    196 Cal.App.4th 1366 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 102 times
    Reversing grant of summary judgment because the trial court improperly noticed statements of the truth of recited facts within the recorded documents

  9. People v. Peevy

    17 Cal.4th 1184 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 134 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting defendant's attempts in the appellate court to present evidence of widespread police misconduct

  10. Lockyer v. City and County of San Francisco

    33 Cal.4th 1055 (Cal. 2004)   Cited 92 times
    Holding that City and County officials lacked the authority to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, a practice they adopted at the Mayor's direction

  11. Section 1859.31 - Gross Classroom Inventory

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 2 § 1859.31   Cited 4 times   1 Legal Analyses

    The district shall prepare a gross inventory consisting of all classrooms owned or leased in the district, the HSAA or Super HSAA as appropriate. For the purpose of this gross classroom inventory, the following shall be considered a classroom. Any classroom: (a) for which a contract was signed for the construction or acquisition of facilities or for which construction work has commenced at the time the SFP application for determination of eligibility is submitted to the OPSC; (b) constructed with

  12. Section 11969.3 - Conditions Reasonably Equivalent

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 5 § 11969.3   Cited 4 times

    The following provisions shall be used to determine whether facilities provided to a charter school are sufficient to accommodate charter school students in conditions reasonably equivalent to those in which the students would be accommodated if they were attending public schools of the school district providing facilities, as required by Education Code section 47614(b). (a) Comparison Group. (1) The standard for determining whether facilities are sufficient to accommodate charter school students

  13. Section 11969.1 - Purpose and Stipulation

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 5 § 11969.1   Cited 2 times

    (a) This article governs provision of facilities by school districts to charter schools under Education Code section 47614. (b) If a charter school and a school district mutually agree to an alternative to specific compliance with any of the provisions of this article, nothing in this article shall prohibit implementation of that alternative, including, for example, funding in lieu of facilities in an amount commensurate with local rental or lease costs for facilities reasonably equivalent to facilities

  14. Section 1859.32 - Adjustments to Gross Classroom Inventory

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 2 § 1859.32   Cited 1 times

    After the gross classroom inventory has been prepared pursuant to Section 1859.31, it will be reduced by the following. Any classrooms: (a) abandoned and approved for replacement as a hardship under the provisions of the LPP; (b) at a school operated on a year-round schedule that has been used continuously for at least 50 percent of the time for preschool programs in the five years preceding the receipt of the application for determination of eligibility; (c) included in any new construction LPP

  15. Section 1859.30 - Calculations to Determine Existing School Building Capacity

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 2 § 1859.30   Cited 1 times

    For new construction projects the district shall complete, on a one-time basis, the classroom inventory pursuant to Sections 1859.31 and 1859.32 and report that inventory on the Form SAB 50-02. Completion of the calculations made on this Form shall represent the district's new construction Existing School Building Capacity. Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 2, § 1859.30 1. New article 4 (sections 1859.30-1859.35) and section filed 12-3-98 as an emergency; operative 12-3-98 (Register 98, No. 49). A Certificate

  16. Section 33 - Emergency Meetings

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 2 § 33

    Emergency meetings of the board shall be called by the president of the board at any time and place within the State of California upon the request of not less than three members of the board. Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 2, § 33 1. Amendment filed 12-31-85; effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 86, No. 1). Note: Authority cited: Section 18701, Government Code. Reference: Sections 11125.5 and 18653, Government Code 1. Amendment filed 12-31-85; effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 86, No. 1)