25 Cited authorities

  1. Volt Info. Scis., Inc. v. Bd. of Trs.

    489 U.S. 468 (1989)   Cited 3,204 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Federal Arbitration Act requires courts to enforce arbitration agreements according to their terms, including where the parties "specify by contract the rules under which arbitration will be conducted"
  2. Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc.

    24 Cal.4th 83 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 1,744 times   45 Legal Analyses
    Holding unilateral arbitration provision substantively unconscionable
  3. Pinnacle Museum Tower Association v. Pinnacle Market Development (Us), LLC

    55 Cal.4th 223 (Cal. 2012)   Cited 607 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an arbitration clause in CC&Rs was binding on the homeowners' association, even though the association did not exist as an independent entity when the CC&Rs were drafted and recorded
  4. Little v. Auto Stiegler, Inc.

    29 Cal.4th 1064 (Cal. 2003)   Cited 389 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding "procedural element" established where employer had "imposed on [employee] an adhesive arbitration agreement"; observing "few employees are in a position to refuse a job because of an arbitration requirement"
  5. Mercuro v. Superior Court

    96 Cal.App.4th 167 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 255 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding arbitration provision substantively unconscionable where it "compel[ed] arbitration of the claims employees are more likely to bring"
  6. Fitz v. NCR Corp.

    118 Cal.App.4th 702 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 225 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an incorporated AAA discovery rule was deliberately hidden by a conflicting discovery provision in the arbitration agreement
  7. Cronus Invs., Inc. v. Concierge Servs.

    35 Cal.4th 376 (Cal. 2005)   Cited 195 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that section 1281.2, subd. (c) "does not undermine or frustrate the FAA's substantive policy favoring arbitration" and, thus, is not preempted
  8. Hoover v. American Income Life Insurance Co.

    206 Cal.App.4th 1193 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012)   Cited 141 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the rights accorded by [Labor Code] sections 203, 1194, and 2802 may not be subject to negotiation or waiver .... For an arbitration clause to operate for individual statutory claims, there must be a clear and unmistakable waiver of a judicial forum."
  9. Bruni v. Didion

    160 Cal.App.4th 1272 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 158 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding plaintiffs are not bound by Evid. Code, § 622 to a recital that they had read a sample copy of a warranty booklet"
  10. Trivedi v. Curexo Technology Corp.

    189 Cal.App.4th 387 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 124 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that failure to attach the AAA arbitration rules weighed in favor of a finding of procedural unconscionability
  11. Section 1 - "Maritime transactions" and "commerce" defined; exceptions to operation of title

    9 U.S.C. § 1   Cited 11,856 times   206 Legal Analyses
    Defining the word "commerce" in the language of the Commerce Clause itself
  12. Section 2 - Validity, irrevocability, and enforcement of agreements to arbitrate

    9 U.S.C. § 2   Cited 10,883 times   117 Legal Analyses
    Granting federal jurisdiction where there is "a transaction involving [interstate] commerce"
  13. Section 1281.8 - Application for provisional remedy in connection with arbitrable controversy

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1281.8   Cited 137 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Allowing a party to an arbitration agreement to seek preliminary injunctive relief regardless of the arbitration agreement's language
  14. Rule 8.500 - Petition for review

    Cal. R. 8.500   Cited 337 times

    (a)Right to file a petition, answer, or reply (1) A party may file a petition in the Supreme Court for review of any decision of the Court of Appeal, including any interlocutory order, except the denial of a transfer of a case within the appellate jurisdiction of the superior court. (2) A party may file an answer responding to the issues raised in the petition. In the answer, the party may ask the court to address additional issues if it grants review. (3) The petitioner may file a reply to the answer