No. S116081 May 19, 2005 Appeal from the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, No. 315686, A. James Robertson II, Judge. Law Offices of Frank P. Angel, Frank P. Angel, Curtis M. Horton, Phyl van Ammers, Meredith Lobel-Angel and Edward Grutzmacher for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Manuel M. Medeiros, State Solicitor General, Richard M. Frank, Chief Assistant Attorney General, J. Matthew Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, Jamee Jordan Patterson and
The following species and subspecies are hereby declared to be endangered or threatened, as indicated: (a) Endangered: (1) Crustaceans: (A) California freshwater shrimp (Syncaris pacifica) (B) Shasta crayfish (Pacifastacus fortis) (2) Fishes: (A) Bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) (B) Mohave tui chub (Gila bicolor mohavensis) (C) Owens tui chub (Gila bicolor snyderi) (D) Bonytail (Gila elegans) (E) Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius) (F) Lost River sucker (Deltistes luxatus) (G) Modoc sucker
(Note: These regulations were drafted to provide a petition form and rules and procedures governing the submission and review of petitions for listing, uplisting, downlisting and delisting of endangered and threatened species of plants and animals. The intent of the 1994 amendments is a smoother and more effective implementation of the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) through procedural clarity. While these amendments generally follow the chronology of the CESA statutes, they do not recreate
(a)Award of costs (1) Except as provided in this rule, the party prevailing in the Court of Appeal in a civil case other than a juvenile case is entitled to costs on appeal. (2) The prevailing party is the respondent if the Court of Appeal affirms the judgment without modification or dismisses the appeal. The prevailing party is the appellant if the court reverses the judgment in its entirety. (3) If the Court of Appeal reverses the judgment in part or modifies it, or if there is more than one notice