52 Cited authorities

United States v. Powell
469 U.S. 57 (1984) Cited 2,044 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a defendant can be convicted of telephone facilitation despite an acquittal on the predicate felony
Schad v. Arizona
501 U.S. 624 (1991) Cited 1,371 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding constitutional Arizona's scheme of providing general verdicts for first-degree murder based on either premeditation or felony murder, without requiring jury unanimity
People v. Johnson
26 Cal.3d 557 (Cal. 1980) Cited 4,475 times
Holding that an attorney may not waive a defendant's right to a speedy trial to accommodate the interests of other clients rather than benefit the defendant
People v. Watson
46 Cal.2d 818 (Cal. 1956) Cited 13,696 times
Holding that certain trial errors are harmless unless there is a reasonable probability that a different result would have occurred absent the error
People v. Correa
54 Cal.4th 331 (Cal. 2012) Cited 716 times
Holding that section 654 does not bar multiple punishment for multiple violations of the same criminal statute and disapproving contrary dictum in Neal v. State of California
People v. Benavides
35 Cal.4th 69 (Cal. 2005) Cited 851 times
Holding appellate review is not waived where a defendant fails to timely object to an instruction on consciousness of guilt
People v. Latimer
5 Cal.4th 1203 (Cal. 1993) Cited 1,247 times
Finding single objectives for kidnapping and rape even though “[i]t could be argued that defendant had two intents”
People v. Harrison
48 Cal.3d 321 (Cal. 1989) Cited 1,344 times
Upholding separate punishments for three acts of sexual penetration over the course of less than 10 minutes where "each of defendant's 'repenetrations' was clearly volitional, criminal and occasioned by a separate act of force."
People v. Lopez
19 Cal.4th 282 (Cal. 1998) Cited 579 times
Ruling that § 647.6, subd. is not an LIO offense of a nonforcible lewd touching under § 288, subd.
People v. Alvarez
27 Cal.4th 1161 (Cal. 2002) Cited 485 times
Holding that California's corpus delicti rule does not restrict the admissibility of incriminatory extrajudicial statements by the accused

PEOPLE v. GONZALEZ

52 Cited authorities

Holding that a defendant can be convicted of telephone facilitation despite an acquittal on the predicate felony

Holding constitutional Arizona's scheme of providing general verdicts for first-degree murder based on either premeditation or felony murder, without requiring jury unanimity

Holding that an attorney may not waive a defendant's right to a speedy trial to accommodate the interests of other clients rather than benefit the defendant

Holding that certain trial errors are harmless unless there is a reasonable probability that a different result would have occurred absent the error

Holding that section 654 does not bar multiple punishment for multiple violations of the same criminal statute and disapproving contrary dictum in Neal v. State of California

Holding appellate review is not waived where a defendant fails to timely object to an instruction on consciousness of guilt

Finding single objectives for kidnapping and rape even though “[i]t could be argued that defendant had two intents”

Upholding separate punishments for three acts of sexual penetration over the course of less than 10 minutes where "each of defendant's 'repenetrations' was clearly volitional, criminal and occasioned by a separate act of force."

Ruling that § 647.6, subd. is not an LIO offense of a nonforcible lewd touching under § 288, subd.

Holding that California's corpus delicti rule does not restrict the admissibility of incriminatory extrajudicial statements by the accused