31 Cited authorities

U.S. v. Williams
553 U.S. 285 (2008) Cited 1,606 times 10 Legal Analyses
Holding that solicitation is "categorically excluded from First Amendment protection"
Virginia v. Black
538 U.S. 343 (2003) Cited 1,023 times 10 Legal Analyses
Holding that the First Amendment protects the burning of a 25–foot cross at a Ku Klux Klan rally
Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition
535 U.S. 234 (2002) Cited 945 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding invalid the challenged provision of the CPPA because it “cover[ed] materials beyond the categories recognized in Ferber and Miller”
People v. Superior Court (Romero)
13 Cal.4th 497 (Cal. 1996) Cited 6,218 times
Holding that the sentencing court has the power under the Three Strikes Law to dismiss one or more prior “strikes” in the interest of justice
People v. Carmony
33 Cal.4th 367 (Cal. 2004) Cited 3,242 times
Holding that the Court of Appeal erred in reversing a trial court's ruling denying a request to strike prior convictions because the appellate court "simply disagreed with the [trial] court's weighing of [the relevant] factors"
People v. Lewis
25 Cal.4th 610 (Cal. 2001) Cited 1,405 times
Holding even "inherently inconsistent verdicts are allowed to stand"
Watts v. United States
394 U.S. 705 (1969) Cited 826 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that the defendant engaged in protected speech where he stated, "[i]f they ever make me carry a rifle the first man I want to get in my sights is L.B.J," during speech at Washington Monument opposing military draft
People v. Flood
18 Cal.4th 470 (Cal. 1998) Cited 1,059 times
Concluding that harmless error analysis rather than automatic reversal is required where jury instruction removed an element from jury consideration because, among other things, the element was established by "overwhelming and uncontradicted evidence"
People v. Toledo
26 Cal.4th 221 (Cal. 2001) Cited 861 times
Holding the language of the sections 422 and 664 support the existence of the crime of attempted criminal threats
People v. Taylor
48 Cal.4th 574 (Cal. 2010) Cited 605 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that, although defendant cursed and lunged at defense counsel, "heated words alone do not require substitution of counsel without a showing of an irreconcilable conflict"
Rule 8.1110 - Partial publication
Cal. R. 8.1110 Cited 2,327 times
(a)Order for partial publication A majority of the rendering court may certify for publication any part of an opinion meeting a standard for publication under rule 8.1105. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007.) (b) Opinion contents The published part of the opinion must specify the part or parts not certified for publication. All material, factual and legal, including the disposition, that aids in the application or interpretation of the published part must be published. (c) Construction For
Rule 8.1105 - Publication of appellate opinions
Cal. R. 8.1105 Cited 2,088 times
(a)Supreme Court All opinions of the Supreme Court are published in the Official Reports. (b)Courts of Appeal and appellate divisions Except as provided in (e), an opinion of a Court of Appeal or a superior court appellate division is published in the Official Reports if a majority of the rendering court certifies the opinion for publication before the decision is final in that court. (Subd (b) amended effective July 23, 2008; adopted effective April 1, 2007.) (c)Standards for certification An opinion
Rule 8.504 - Form and contents of petition, answer, and reply
Cal. R. 8.504 Cited 21 times
(a)In general Except as provided in this rule, a petition for review, answer, and reply must comply with the relevant provisions of rule 8.204. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007.) (b) Contents of a petition (1) The body of the petition must begin with a concise, nonargumentative statement of the issues presented for review, framing them in terms of the facts of the case but without unnecessary detail. (2) The petition must explain how the case presents a ground for review under rule 8.500(b)

PEOPLE v. CHANDLER

31 Cited authorities

Holding that solicitation is "categorically excluded from First Amendment protection"

Holding that the First Amendment protects the burning of a 25–foot cross at a Ku Klux Klan rally

Holding invalid the challenged provision of the CPPA because it “cover[ed] materials beyond the categories recognized in Ferber and Miller”

Holding that the sentencing court has the power under the Three Strikes Law to dismiss one or more prior “strikes” in the interest of justice

Holding that the Court of Appeal erred in reversing a trial court's ruling denying a request to strike prior convictions because the appellate court "simply disagreed with the [trial] court's weighing of [the relevant] factors"

Holding even "inherently inconsistent verdicts are allowed to stand"

Holding that the defendant engaged in protected speech where he stated, "[i]f they ever make me carry a rifle the first man I want to get in my sights is L.B.J," during speech at Washington Monument opposing military draft

Concluding that harmless error analysis rather than automatic reversal is required where jury instruction removed an element from jury consideration because, among other things, the element was established by "overwhelming and uncontradicted evidence"

Holding the language of the sections 422 and 664 support the existence of the crime of attempted criminal threats

Holding that, although defendant cursed and lunged at defense counsel, "heated words alone do not require substitution of counsel without a showing of an irreconcilable conflict"