§Why CasetextPricing

PEOPLE v. BLACK

Appellant’s Reply Brief on the Merits

5 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Watson

    46 Cal.2d 818 (Cal. 1956)   Cited 13,690 times
    Holding that certain trial errors are harmless unless there is a reasonable probability that a different result would have occurred absent the error

  2. People v. Coleman

    46 Cal.3d 749 (Cal. 1988)   Cited 147 times
    Using same felony for felony-murder conviction, special circumstance, and aggravating factor is proper

  3. People v. Armendariz

    37 Cal.3d 573 (Cal. 1984)   Cited 96 times
    In Armendariz, after the guilt phase jury had been chosen and sworn but before the alternates had been sworn, the trial court discharged two of the regular jurors.

  4. Wolfe v. State

    147 Tex. Crim. 62 (Tex. Crim. App. 1944)   Cited 60 times
    Holding that if a challenge for cause is improperly denied, the accused need not state why the identified juror left on venire was objectionable

  5. People v. O'Connor

    81 Cal.App. 506 (Cal. Ct. App. 1927)   Cited 35 times
    In People v. O'Connor, 81 Cal.App. 506 [ 254 P. 630], the defendant was denied the right to exercise the number of peremptory challenges to which he was entitled under the statute.