30 Cited authorities

  1. United States Trust Co. v. New Jersey

    431 U.S. 1 (1977)   Cited 1,025 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding a contractual impairment unreasonable in part because for "over a half century" "the need for mass transportation in the New York metropolitan area was not a new development, and the likelihood that publicly owned commuter railroads would produce substantial deficits was well known"
  2. Energy Reserves Group v. Kansas Power Light

    459 U.S. 400 (1983)   Cited 828 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that state law regulating intrastate price of natural gas did not substantially impair private party's contract rights because industry was heavily regulated and company had no reasonable expectation of receiving windfall from deregulated prices
  3. General Motors Corp. v. Romein

    503 U.S. 181 (1992)   Cited 545 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding there was no contractual relationship regarding the statutory terms at issue, and therefore no violation of the Contract Clause
  4. Alabama v. North Carolina

    560 U.S. 330 (2010)   Cited 213 times
    Rejecting an implied duty of good faith and fair dealing in interstate compacts
  5. Pacific Gas E. Co. v. G.W. Thomas Drayage Etc. Co.

    69 Cal.2d 33 (Cal. 1968)   Cited 1,022 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the court erroneously refused to consider extrinsic evidence offered to prove the meaning of a provision to which it was reasonably susceptible
  6. Kansas v. Colorado

    514 U.S. 673 (1995)   Cited 96 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating "laches requires proof of lack of diligence by the party against whom the defense is asserted, and prejudice to the party asserting the defense."
  7. Tarrant Reg'l Water Dist. v. Herrmann

    569 U.S. 614 (2013)   Cited 53 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that because many compacts unambiguously permit signatory States to cross each other's borders to fulfill obligations under the compact, the absence of such a provision in the Red River Compact "strongly suggests that the cross-border rights were never intended to be part of the States' agreement"
  8. U.S. Steel Corp. v. Multistate Tax Comm'n

    434 U.S. 452 (1978)   Cited 101 times
    Holding that the Multistate Tax Compact did not "enhance state power" with respect to the federal government and therefore did not require congressional consent
  9. Texas v. New Mexico

    462 U.S. 554 (1983)   Cited 67 times
    Holding that, upon approval by Congress, a compact between states becomes federal law that binds the states
  10. New Jersey v. State of Delaware

    552 U.S. 597 (2008)   Cited 11 times
    Noting that Delaware's CMP contains an LNG terminal ban approved in 1979
  11. Section 31

    Cal. Const. art. XIII § 31   Cited 6 times

    The power to tax may not be surrendered or suspended by grant or contract. Cal. Const. art. XIII § 31