431 U.S. 1 (1977) Cited 1,025 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding a contractual impairment unreasonable in part because for "over a half century" "the need for mass transportation in the New York metropolitan area was not a new development, and the likelihood that publicly owned commuter railroads would produce substantial deficits was well known"
459 U.S. 400 (1983) Cited 828 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding that state law regulating intrastate price of natural gas did not substantially impair private party's contract rights because industry was heavily regulated and company had no reasonable expectation of receiving windfall from deregulated prices
Holding that the court erroneously refused to consider extrinsic evidence offered to prove the meaning of a provision to which it was reasonably susceptible
514 U.S. 673 (1995) Cited 96 times 1 Legal Analyses
Stating "laches requires proof of lack of diligence by the party against whom the defense is asserted, and prejudice to the party asserting the defense."
569 U.S. 614 (2013) Cited 53 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding that because many compacts unambiguously permit signatory States to cross each other's borders to fulfill obligations under the compact, the absence of such a provision in the Red River Compact "strongly suggests that the cross-border rights were never intended to be part of the States' agreement"
Holding that the Multistate Tax Compact did not "enhance state power" with respect to the federal government and therefore did not require congressional consent