46 Cited authorities

  1. Griswold v. Connecticut

    381 U.S. 479 (1965)   Cited 3,305 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding unconstitutional state law that criminalized the use of "any drug, medicinal article or instrument for the purpose of preventing conception"
  2. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Bd. of Equalization

    19 Cal.4th 1 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 640 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “administrative interpretation ... will be accorded great respect by the courts and will be followed it not clearly erroneous”
  3. Doe v. City of Los Angeles

    42 Cal.4th 531 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 257 times
    Holding courts construing California statutes "may not broaden or narrow the scope of the provision by reading into it language that does not appear in it or reading out of it language that does."
  4. Burden v. Snowden

    2 Cal.4th 556 (Cal. 1992)   Cited 346 times

    Docket No. S021885. April 30, 1992. Appeal from Superior Court of Orange County, No. 590772, William F. Rylaarsdam, Judge. COUNSEL Thomas Kathe, City Attorney, Filarsky Watt, Steve A. Filarsky, Pillsbury, Madison Sutro, Amy D. Hogue and Kevin M. Fong for Defendants and Appellants. Mayer Reeves, Thomas M. Reeves, Irving Berger, Martin J. Mayer, Whitmore, Johnson Bolanos, Richard S. Whitmore, Craig W. Patenaude and Helene L. Leichter as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants. John K. York

  5. Amador Valley Jt. Un. High Sch. v. State Bd. of Equal

    22 Cal.3d 208 (Cal. 1978)   Cited 409 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that although initiative measure's title and summary were technically imprecise, they substantially complied with the law
  6. Torres v. Parkhouse Tire Service, Inc.

    26 Cal.4th 995 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 185 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting suggestion to import rules of criminal law into workers' compensation law without legislative mandate
  7. Hillsborough v. Cromwell

    326 U.S. 620 (1946)   Cited 283 times
    Endorsing "great deference to the views of the judges of those courts 'who are familiar with the intricacies and trends of local law and practice'"
  8. Woods v. Young

    53 Cal.3d 315 (Cal. 1991)   Cited 207 times
    Holding statute of limitations for medical malpractice actions is one year and 90 days when the plaintiff sends the physician-defendant a 90-day notice of intent to sue
  9. California Mfrs. Assn. v. Public Utilities Com

    24 Cal.3d 836 (Cal. 1979)   Cited 182 times

    Docket Nos. S.F. 23823, 23881. August 15, 1979. COUNSEL Gordon E. Davis, William H. Booth, Brobeck, Phleger Harrison, Robert D. Raven, James J. Garrett, Charles R. Farrar, James P. Bennett, Morrison Foerster, Robert L. Schmalz, J. Randolph Elliott, John L. Frogge, Jr., Kenneth M. Robinson, Donald H. Ford, Overton, Lyman Prince and Bill B. Betz for Petitioners. Janice E. Kerr, Hector Anninos, Timothy E. Treacy and Walter H. Kessenick for Respondents. Malcolm H. Furbush, Robert Ohlbach, Shirley A.

  10. Superior Court v. County of Mendocino

    13 Cal.4th 45 (Cal. 1996)   Cited 111 times
    Upholding facial validity of a statutory designation of one or more unpaid furlough days on which trial courts shall not be in session, because the statute would not necessarily defeat or materially impair a court's fulfillment of its constitutional duties
  11. Section 1

    Cal. Const. art. XIII § 1   Cited 206 times

    Unless otherwise provided by this Constitution or the laws of the United States: (a) All property is taxable and shall be assessed at the same percentage of fair market value. When a value standard other than fair market value is prescribed by this Constitution or by statute authorized by this Constitution, the same percentage shall be applied to determine the assessed value. The value to which the percentage is applied, whether it be the fair market value or not, shall be known for property tax

  12. Section 2

    Cal. Const. art. XIIIA § 2   Cited 108 times
    Limiting inflation adjustments to 2% per year
  13. Section 1

    Cal. Const. art. XII § 1   Cited 58 times

    The Public Utilities Commission consists of 5 members appointed by the Governor and approved by the Senate, a majority of the membership concurring, for staggered 6-year terms. A vacancy is filled for the remainder of the term. The Legislature may remove a member for incompetence, neglect of duty, or corruption, two thirds of the membership of each house concurring. Cal. Const. art. XII § 1

  14. Section 62 - Transfers not change of ownership

    Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 62   Cited 44 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Listing as exclusion to change of ownership "[a]ny transfer of a lessor's interest in taxable real property subject to a lease with a remaining term ... of 35 years or more"
  15. Section 2

    Cal. Const. art. XIII § 2   Cited 25 times
    Authorizing property taxes on these seven intangibles
  16. Section 62.1 - Change in ownership; exclusions

    Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 62.1   Cited 10 times
    In section 62.1(b), the interest that is being divided “proportionally” is “the real property of the park” (§ 62.1(b)(1)), and the rate (or proportion) according to which it is being divided is “the number of shares of voting stock, or other... membership interests, transferred divided by the total number of outstanding issued or unissued shares of voting stock of... or membership interests in, the entity that acquired the park” (§ 62.1(b)(2)).
  17. Section 3 - Value Approaches

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 18 § 3   Cited 31 times
    Defining income approach as "[t]he amount that investors would be willing to pay for the right to receive the income that the property would be expected to yield, with the risks attendant upon its receipt"