In French, the defendant pleaded no contest to six counts of lewd and lascivious conduct with a child under the age of fourteen pursuant to a plea agreement in which he was to receive no more than eighteen years in prison.
In Villalobos, we held that "mere silence by the parties and trial court concerning a statutorily mandated punishment does not make exclusion of the punishment a negotiated term of a plea agreement."
Concluding that on appeal from a conviction based on a guilty plea, the appellate court may entertain cognizable claims not identified in defendant's statement of grounds and trial court's certificate of probable cause
Holding the Attorney General was judicially estopped from disavowing a stipulation calling for imposition of a two-year term of civil commitment of a sexually violent predator notwithstanding a change in intervening law (The Sexual Punishment and Control Act: Jessica's law, Proposition 83) that called for sexually violent predators to be committed indefinitely, even though "a stipulation similar to the one we consider in the present case now could not properly be negotiated, entered into, and enforced"
In Newman, supra, 21 Cal.4th 413, the prosecutor charged the defendant with being a felon in possession of a firearm (§ 12021) and alleged six prior felony convictions enhancements.