§Why CasetextPricing

VALDEZ v. W.C.A.B. (WAREHOUSE DEMO SERVICES)

Respondents, Warehouse Demo Services and Zurich North America, Opposition

14 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Holt

    15 Cal.4th 619 (Cal. 1997)   Cited 1,873 times
    Holding that the failure to record statements did not violate the due process clause of either the state or federal constitution

  2. People v. Mooc

    26 Cal.4th 1216 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 1,398 times
    Holding the trial court should make a record of the documents it examined before ruling on a Pitchess motion, and can do so by describing the documents on the record

  3. People v. Jones

    51 Cal.3d 294 (Cal. 1990)   Cited 1,618 times
    Holding that "jury unanimity is [not] necessarily unattainable where testimony regarding repeated identical offenses is presented in child molestation cases"

  4. Lona v. Citibank, N.A.

    202 Cal.App.4th 89 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 521 times
    Holding that where the trustee's deed is void on its face, tender is not required

  5. Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Fremont General Corp.

    148 Cal.App.4th 97 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 355 times
    Holding a net operating loss as intangible property

  6. Riverisland Cold Storage, Inc. v. Fresno-Madera Production Credit Association

    55 Cal.4th 1169 (Cal. 2013)   Cited 234 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that parol evidence may be used to prove promissory fraud

  7. O'Neil v. Crane Co.

    53 Cal.4th 335 (Cal. 2012)   Cited 201 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that product manufacturer is not liable under any theory for harm caused by a third party's products

  8. Doppes v. Bentley Motors, Inc.

    174 Cal.App.4th 967 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 210 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Reversing judgment on the cause of action found in defendant's favor and remanding so that trial court may enter default for that claim, and affirming judgment on remaining claims found in plaintiff's favor

  9. Farm Raised Salmon Cases

    42 Cal.4th 1077 (Cal. 2008)   Cited 212 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Sherman Law violations may form the basis of a UCL claim

  10. People v. Brown

    8 Cal.4th 746 (Cal. 1994)   Cited 269 times
    Permitting evidence of a complaint made by a victim of a sexual offense

  11. Rule 8.500 - Petition for review

    Cal. R. 8.500   Cited 337 times

    (a)Right to file a petition, answer, or reply (1) A party may file a petition in the Supreme Court for review of any decision of the Court of Appeal, including any interlocutory order, except the denial of a transfer of a case within the appellate jurisdiction of the superior court. (2) A party may file an answer responding to the issues raised in the petition. In the answer, the party may ask the court to address additional issues if it grants review. (3) The petitioner may file a reply to the answer