§Why CasetextPricing

PEOPLE v. LE

Appellant, Down George Yang, Answer Brief on the Merits

4 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Lopez

    34 Cal.4th 1002 (Cal. 2005)   Cited 526 times
    Holding that a gang-related first-degree murder could not be enhanced by 10 years as a violent felony under section 186.22, subdivision (b)(C), but "[fell] within that subdivision's excepting clause and is governed instead by the 15-year minimum parole eligibility term" of section 186.22, subdivision (b)

  2. People v. Rodriguez

    47 Cal.4th 501 (Cal. 2009)   Cited 414 times
    Holding that California law precluded a redundant sentencing 10-year firearm use enhancement pursuant to Cal. Penal Code 12022.5, and Cal. Penal Code 186.22 (b)(C) a 10-year enhancement for use of a firearm to benefit a criminal street gang qualifying as a violent felony

  3. People v. Lara

    54 Cal.4th 896 (Cal. 2012)   Cited 270 times
    Finding no pleading and proof requirement for determining presentence credits and affirming trial court's reliance on probation report as to existence of prior conviction

  4. Rule 8.520 - Briefs by parties and amici curiae; judicial notice

    Cal. R. 8.520   Cited 3,146 times

    (a)Parties' briefs; time to file (1) Within 30 days after the Supreme Court files the order of review, the petitioner must serve and file in that court either an opening brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (2) Within 30 days after the petitioner files its brief or the time to do so expires, the opposing party must serve and file either an answer brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (3) The petitioner may file a reply brief on the merits or