§Why CasetextPricing

GARCIA (SERGIO C.) ON ADMISSION

Applicant’s Consolidated Response to Amicus Curiae Brief

57 Cited authorities

  1. Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council

    467 U.S. 837 (1984)   Cited 16,041 times   505 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress"

  2. Wyeth v. Levine

    555 U.S. 555 (2009)   Cited 1,435 times   101 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the FDA's drug labeling judgments pursuant to the FDCA did not obstacle preempt state law products liability claims

  3. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.

    505 U.S. 504 (1992)   Cited 2,404 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an express warranty was not a "requirement ... imposed under State law" because the obligation was imposed by the warrantor

  4. Plyler v. Doe

    457 U.S. 202 (1982)   Cited 3,026 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that States cannot deny to illegal aliens the free public education they provide to citizens and legally documented aliens

  5. Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.

    531 U.S. 457 (2001)   Cited 1,097 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Chevron deference is due only to a " reasonable interpretation made by the administrator of an agency"

  6. Altria Grp., Inc. v. Good

    555 U.S. 70 (2008)   Cited 639 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that federal law did not preempt common-law fraud claim against cigarette manufacturer based on advertising of light cigarettes

  7. Gonzales v. Oregon

    546 U.S. 243 (2006)   Cited 561 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statute did not delegate authority to Attorney General to make medical judgments

  8. Bates v. Dow Agrosciences LLC

    544 U.S. 431 (2005)   Cited 550 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a preemption clause barring state laws "in addition to or different" from a federal Act does not interfere with an "equivalent" state provision

  9. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.

    331 U.S. 218 (1947)   Cited 2,169 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the clear statement rule may be satisfied where "the Act of Congress ... touch[es] a field in which the federal interest is so dominant that the federal system will be assumed to preclude enforcement of state laws on the same subject."

  10. In re Ruffalo

    390 U.S. 544 (1968)   Cited 780 times
    Holding that a lawyer involved in disbarment proceedings is, like a criminal defendant, entitled to "fair notice of the charge," but never explaining how such notice can be provided

  11. Section 1229 - Initiation of removal proceedings

    8 U.S.C. § 1229   Cited 1,351 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing service by mail

  12. Section 1153 - Allocation of immigrant visas

    8 U.S.C. § 1153   Cited 1,167 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Determining an applicant's age as " the age of the alien on the date on which an immigrant visa number becomes available for such alien . . . but only if the alien has sought to acquire the status of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence within one year of such availability; reduced by (B) the number of days in the period during which the applicable petition . . . was pending"

  13. Section 1154 - Procedure for granting immigrant status

    8 U.S.C. § 1154   Cited 1,106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Granting immigrant status

  14. Section 925 - Exceptions: Relief from disabilities

    18 U.S.C. § 925   Cited 364 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Granting district courts discretion to restore firearms rights for felons upon the denial of a petition by the Attorney General

  15. Section 101 - Executive departments

    5 U.S.C. § 101   Cited 135 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Listing the Department of Commerce as an Executive department

  16. Section 1621 - Aliens who are not qualified aliens or nonimmigrants ineligible for State and local public benefits

    8 U.S.C. § 1621   Cited 104 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Granting the U.S. Attorney General sole discretion to exempt certain state or local public benefits from PRWORA’s restrictions

  17. Section 1306 - Penalties

    8 U.S.C. § 1306   Cited 63 times
    In 8 U.S.C. § 1306 (c) and § 1306(d), it specifically provided for the punishment of one "who procures or attempts to procure registration of himself or another person through fraud" and of one who counterfeits an alien registration receipt card.

  18. Section 1302 - Registration of aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1302   Cited 46 times

    (a) It shall be the duty of every alien now or hereafter in the United States, who (1) is fourteen years of age or older, (2) has not been registered and fingerprinted under section 1201(b) of this title or section 30 or 31 of the Alien Registration Act, 1940, and (3) remains in the United States for thirty days or longer, to apply for registration and to be fingerprinted before the expiration of such thirty days. (b) It shall be the duty of every parent or legal guardian of any alien now or hereafter

  19. Section 274a.1 - Definitions

    8 C.F.R. § 274a.1   Cited 30 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Excluding "independent contractor" from the definition of "employee"

  20. Rule 8.520 - Briefs by parties and amici curiae; judicial notice

    Cal. R. 8.520   Cited 3,189 times

    (a)Parties' briefs; time to file (1) Within 30 days after the Supreme Court files the order of review, the petitioner must serve and file in that court either an opening brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (2) Within 30 days after the petitioner files its brief or the time to do so expires, the opposing party must serve and file either an answer brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (3) The petitioner may file a reply brief on the merits or