8 Cited authorities

  1. Beck v. Law Offices of Edwin J.

    284 S.W.3d 416 (Tex. App. 2009)   Cited 103 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding legal malpractice claim focuses on whether attorney represented client with requisite level of skill
  2. Perry v. Brown

    671 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2012)   Cited 63 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding California's constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage violated the United States Constitution in the unique circumstances of same-sex marriage in California
  3. Lewin v. Anselmo

    56 Cal.App.4th 694 (Cal. Ct. App. 1997)   Cited 17 times

    Docket Nos. A073562, A075014. July 22, 1997. [Opinion certified for partial publication. ] Part 1 of this opinion is not certified for publication. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rules 976(b) and 976.1.) Appeals from Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, No. 944954, William J. Cahill, Judge. COUNSEL Fish Snell and Michael J. Fish for Plaintiff and Appellant and for Plaintiff and Respondent. Phillip Ernest Anselmo, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant. Kenneth W. Jenner for Defendants

  4. Hallinan v. Committee of Bar Examiners

    65 Cal.2d 447 (Cal. 1966)   Cited 59 times
    In Hallinan v. Committee of Bar Examiners (1966) 65 Cal.2d 447, 459, 55 Cal.Rptr. 228, 421 P.2d 76, this court explained that "every intentional violation of the law is not, ipso facto, grounds for excluding an individual from membership in the legal profession. [Citations.] ‘There is certain conduct involving fraud, perjury, theft, embezzlement, and bribery where there is no question but that moral turpitude is involved.
  5. Raffaelli v. Committee of Bar Examiners

    7 Cal.3d 288 (Cal. 1972)   Cited 35 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Raffaelli, the California Supreme Court struck down a California statute excluding aliens from admission to the State Bar.
  6. Section 1229b - Cancellation of removal; adjustment of status

    8 U.S.C. § 1229b   Cited 5,095 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Granting the Attorney General discretion to cancel the removal of an alien who has “been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a ... parent who is ... a United States citizen”
  7. Section 274a.1 - Definitions

    8 C.F.R. § 274a.1   Cited 30 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Excluding "independent contractor" from the definition of "employee"
  8. Rule 3.670 - Telephone appearance

    Cal. R. 3.670   Cited 28 times

    (a) Policy favoring telephone appearances The intent of this rule is to promote uniformity in the practices and procedures relating to telephone appearances in civil cases. To improve access to the courts and reduce litigation costs, courts should permit parties, to the extent feasible, to appear by telephone at appropriate conferences, hearings, and proceedings in civil cases. (Subd (a) adopted effective January 1, 2008.) (b) Application Subdivisions (c) through (i) of this rule are suspended from