73 Cited authorities

  1. Schifando v. City of Los Angeles

    31 Cal.4th 1074 (Cal. 2003)   Cited 1,179 times
    Denying request where the materials sought to be judicially noticed were not particularly supportive of the respondent's cause or relevant to the action and noting that "[n]o party has alleged" what the amicus curiae had purported to respond to
  2. McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco

    496 U.S. 18 (1990)   Cited 471 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the due process clause obligates states to "provide meaningful backward-looking relief to rectify any unconstitutional deprivation" resulting from a tax statute
  3. Moore v. Regents of University of California

    51 Cal.3d 120 (Cal. 1990)   Cited 581 times
    Holding that in obtaining a patient's consent to a procedure, "a physician must disclose personal interests unrelated to the patient's health, whether research or economic, that may affect the physician's professional judgment"
  4. Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.

    4 Cal.App.4th 857 (Cal. Ct. App. 1992)   Cited 470 times
    Holding that "intentional infliction of emotional distress is an injury to the person"
  5. American Bankers Ins. Group v. U.S.

    408 F.3d 1328 (11th Cir. 2005)   Cited 269 times
    Holding doctrine not applicable to revenue ruling on long-distance phone calls in interpreting communications excise tax
  6. Hassan v. Mercy American River Hospital

    31 Cal.4th 709 (Cal. 2003)   Cited 280 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Considering this issue in the context of statutory interpretation
  7. City of San Jose v. Superior Court

    12 Cal.3d 447 (Cal. 1974)   Cited 673 times
    Holding that government claims procedures are mandatory and failure to file the required claim means the action must be dismissed
  8. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. City of La Habra

    25 Cal.4th 809 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 259 times
    Holding that city's continued imposition and collection of a tax without voter approval was a continuous violation, and therefore limitations period began anew with each collection and did not bar claims for declaratory and mandamus relief
  9. People v. Cruz

    13 Cal.4th 764 (Cal. 1996)   Cited 279 times
    Holding that burglary of an inhabited vessel constituted burglary of "an inhabited dwelling house"
  10. Wilcox v. Birtwhistle

    21 Cal.4th 973 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 207 times
    Acknowledging that, while not determinative, legislative silence after a court has construed a statute may give rise to an inference of acquiescence or passive approval
  11. Section 313 - Presentation of claims against governmental entity as prerequisite to commencement of action

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 313   Cited 13 times

    The general procedure for the presentation of claims as a prerequisite to commencement of actions for money or damages against the State of California, counties, cities, cities and counties, districts, local authorities, and other political subdivisions of the State, and against the officers, employees, and servants thereof, is prescribed by Division 3.6 (commencing with Section 810) of Title 1 of the Government Code. Ca. Civ. Proc. Code § 313 Amended by Stats. 1963, Ch. 1715.

  12. Rule 8.204 - Contents and format of briefs

    Cal. R. 8.204   Cited 4,136 times

    (a) Contents (1) Each brief must: (A) Begin with a table of contents and a table of authorities separately listing cases, constitutions, statutes, court rules, and other authorities cited; (B) State each point under a separate heading or subheading summarizing the point, and support each point by argument and, if possible, by citation of authority; and (C) Support any reference to a matter in the record by a citation to the volume and page number of the record where the matter appears. If any part

  13. Rule 8.504 - Form and contents of petition, answer, and reply

    Cal. R. 8.504   Cited 15 times

    (a)In general Except as provided in this rule, a petition for review, answer, and reply must comply with the relevant provisions of rule 8.204. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007.) (b) Contents of a petition (1) The body of the petition must begin with a concise, nonargumentative statement of the issues presented for review, framing them in terms of the facts of the case but without unnecessary detail. (2) The petition must explain how the case presents a ground for review under rule 8.500(b)