§Why CasetextPricing

LONG BEACH POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION v. CITY OF LONG BEACH (LOS ANGELES TIMES COMMUNICATIONS)

Real Party in Interest and Respondent, Los Angeles Times Communications LLC, Request for Judicial Notice

19 Cited authorities

  1. Hayward v. Marshall

    603 F.3d 546 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 1,193 times
    Holding that a certificate of appealability is required to challenge the denial of parole

  2. Biggs v. Terhune

    334 F.3d 910 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 570 times
    Holding that due process requirements are satisfied if some evidence supports parole board decision and the evidence has some indicia of reliability

  3. McKelvey v. Boeing North American, Inc.

    73 Cal.App.4th 601 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 184 times
    Applying the standard to a class action

  4. Seelig v. Infinity Broadcasting Corp.

    97 Cal.App.4th 798 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 166 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he phrase big skank is not actionable because it is too vague to be capable of being proven true or false" and "the term skank constitutes rhetorical hyperbole which no listener could reasonably have interpreted to be a statement of actual fact"

  5. Gentry v. Ebay, Inc.

    99 Cal.App.4th 816 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 156 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that website is an interactive computer service

  6. Times Mirror Co. v. Superior Court

    53 Cal.3d 1325 (Cal. 1991)   Cited 131 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding wholesale production of almost five years of governor's calendars and schedules not supported by identifiable public interest

  7. Pollstar v. Gigmania, Ltd.

    170 F. Supp. 2d 974 (E.D. Cal. 2000)   Cited 41 times
    Finding no authority for judicial notice of pleadings in an unrelated case

  8. Walt Rankin Associates v. City of Murrieta

    84 Cal.App.4th 605 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 35 times
    Finding no statutory basis for granting the city immunity from its failure to discharge mandatory duties relating to payment bonds

  9. Hofmann Co. v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.

    202 Cal.App.3d 390 (Cal. Ct. App. 1988)   Cited 41 times
    Applying "of and concerning" factors to claim of trade libel

  10. Cuccia v. Superior Court

    153 Cal.App.4th 347 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 16 times
    In Cuccia, the medical director wrote that the patient's severe mental disorder was in remission, the patient did not represent a substantial danger of physical harm to others by reason of his mental illness, and the patient could be safely and effectively treated on an outpatient basis.

  11. Section 452 - Matters permitting judicial notice

    Cal. Evid. Code § 452   Cited 8,264 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Permitting notice to be taken of the "[o]fficial acts of the . . . judicial departments . . . of any state of the United States"

  12. Section 459 - Duties of reviewing court

    Cal. Evid. Code § 459   Cited 4,382 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Reviewing court may take judicial notice of any matter specified in § 452

  13. Rule 8.252 - Judicial notice; findings and evidence on appeal

    Cal. R. 8.252   Cited 620 times

    (a)Judicial notice (1) To obtain judicial notice by a reviewing court under Evidence Code section 459, a party must serve and file a separate motion with a proposed order. (2) The motion must state: (A) Why the matter to be noticed is relevant to the appeal; (B) Whether the matter to be noticed was presented to the trial court and, if so, whether judicial notice was taken by that court; (C) If judicial notice of the matter was not taken by the trial court, why the matter is subject to judicial notice