§Why CasetextPricing

PEOPLE v. NUCKLES

Appellant’s Reply Brief on the Merits

18 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Albillar

    51 Cal.4th 47 (Cal. 2010)   Cited 1,668 times
    Holding that "if substantial evidence establishes that the defendant intended to and did commit the charged felony with known members of a gang, the jury may fairly infer that the defendant had the specific intent to promote, further, or assist criminal conduct by those gang members"

  2. Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez

    372 U.S. 144 (1963)   Cited 1,759 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, "[a]bsent conclusive evidence of congressional intent as to the penal nature of a statute, these factors must be considered in relation to the statute on its face"

  3. Ghirardo v. Antonioli

    8 Cal.4th 791 (Cal. 1994)   Cited 649 times
    Determining that whether a particular transaction was a loan subject to usury law or an exempt transaction of a different character was a question of law

  4. In re Resendiz

    25 Cal.4th 230 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 427 times
    Holding "that affirmative misadvice regarding immigration consequences can in certain circumstances constitute ineffective assistance of counsel"

  5. People v. King

    38 Cal.4th 617 (Cal. 2006)   Cited 138 times
    In People v. King (2006) 38 Cal.4th 617, 42 Cal.Rptr.3d 743, 133 P.3d 636 (King), our Supreme Court rejected the Attorney General's argument that instruments coming within that section never could be possessed lawfully.

  6. In re Alva

    33 Cal.4th 254 (Cal. 2004)   Cited 141 times
    Holding that lifetime registration for misdemeanor sexual offenders was not `punishment within the meaning of the cruel or unusual punishment clause'

  7. People v. Louis

    42 Cal.3d 969 (Cal. 1986)   Cited 202 times
    Finding prejudice where the record failed to dispel beyond a reasonable doubt the possibility that the defendant's testimony was " 'impelled by the erroneous introduction' " of inadmissible evidence

  8. In re Reed

    33 Cal.3d 914 (Cal. 1983)   Cited 97 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding registration unconstitutional

  9. People v. Moore

    69 Cal.App.4th 626 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 51 times
    Holding any commitment defendant might suffer under the sexual violent predator act would not be a direct consequence of his plea

  10. People v. Mauch

    163 Cal.App.4th 669 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 32 times
    Holding that a crime punishable only by imprisonment in the state prison is a “straight felony” that cannot be designated as a misdemeanor

  11. Section 2000 - Rules of Construction and Definitions

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 15 § 2000   Cited 68 times
    Defining the Board of Prison Terms and related hearing panel

  12. Rule 8.520 - Briefs by parties and amici curiae; judicial notice

    Cal. R. 8.520   Cited 3,160 times

    (a)Parties' briefs; time to file (1) Within 30 days after the Supreme Court files the order of review, the petitioner must serve and file in that court either an opening brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (2) Within 30 days after the petitioner files its brief or the time to do so expires, the opposing party must serve and file either an answer brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (3) The petitioner may file a reply brief on the merits or