72 Cited authorities

  1. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion

    563 U.S. 333 (2011)   Cited 3,351 times   592 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a ban on collective-action waivers in those contracts worked to "disfavor arbitration"
  2. First Options of Chi., Inc. v. Kaplan

    514 U.S. 938 (1995)   Cited 4,900 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a circuit court reviewing a district court's disposition of an arbitration award should apply "ordinary, not special, standards."
  3. Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. Animalfeeds Intr.

    559 U.S. 662 (2010)   Cited 1,525 times   209 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a prudential ripeness argument was waived
  4. Volt Info. Scis., Inc. v. Bd. of Trs.

    489 U.S. 468 (1989)   Cited 3,023 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Federal Arbitration Act requires courts to enforce arbitration agreements according to their terms, including where the parties "specify by contract the rules under which arbitration will be conducted"
  5. Doctor's Assocs., Inc. v. Casarotto

    517 U.S. 681 (1996)   Cited 1,773 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding "that Montana's first-page notice requirement, which governs not ‘any contract,’ but specifically and solely contracts ‘subject to arbitration,’ conflicts with the FAA and is therefore displaced by the federal measure."
  6. Perry v. Thomas

    482 U.S. 483 (1987)   Cited 1,281 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the FAA preempted a state statute permitting litigation of wage collection actions despite the existence of any private agreement to arbitrate
  7. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.

    388 U.S. 395 (1967)   Cited 2,801 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts are the proper forum to evaluate a challenge to the validity of an arbitration clause, but that where the entire agreement of which an arbitration clause is but a part is challenged, such evaluation is properly left to the arbitrator
  8. Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc.

    24 Cal.4th 83 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 1,612 times   43 Legal Analyses
    Holding unilateral arbitration provision substantively unconscionable
  9. Compucredit Corp. v. Greenwood

    565 U.S. 95 (2012)   Cited 217 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that contract “parties remain free to specify” their choice of judicial forum “so long as the guarantee ” of the Act “is preserved.”
  10. Lona v. Citibank, N.A.

    202 Cal.App.4th 89 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 499 times
    Holding that where the trustee's deed is void on its face, tender is not required
  11. Section 2 - Validity, irrevocability, and enforcement of agreements to arbitrate

    9 U.S.C. § 2   Cited 9,943 times   111 Legal Analyses
    Granting federal jurisdiction where there is "a transaction involving [interstate] commerce"
  12. Section 1670.5 - Contract or clause unconscionable

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1670.5   Cited 711 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Adopting UCC section 2-302 and making it generally applicable to all contracts
  13. Section 1226 - Motor vehicle franchise contract dispute resolution process

    15 U.S.C. § 1226   Cited 35 times
    Requiring separate consent in writing to arbitrate after a dispute arises, notwithstanding any arbitration clause in a franchise agreement
  14. Rule 8.204 - Contents and format of briefs

    Cal. R. 8.204   Cited 4,236 times

    (a) Contents (1) Each brief must: (A) Begin with a table of contents and a table of authorities separately listing cases, constitutions, statutes, court rules, and other authorities cited; (B) State each point under a separate heading or subheading summarizing the point, and support each point by argument and, if possible, by citation of authority; and (C) Support any reference to a matter in the record by a citation to the volume and page number of the record where the matter appears. If any part