37 Cited authorities

  1. Katz v. United States

    389 U.S. 347 (1967)   Cited 12,463 times   74 Legal Analyses
    Holding that failure to recognize a reasonable expectation of privacy in a telephone booth would "ignore the vital role that the public telephone has come to play in private communication"
  2. United States v. Place

    462 U.S. 696 (1983)   Cited 3,264 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding 90-minute detention of luggage unreasonable based on nature of interference with person's travels and lack of diligence of police
  3. United States v. Jacobsen

    466 U.S. 109 (1984)   Cited 3,029 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a legal seizure of a package became illegal when officers conducted a field test on it because the test "affect[ed] respondents' possessory interests ... by destroying a quantity of the powder [thereby] convert[ing] what had been only a temporary deprivation of possessory interests into a permanent one"
  4. California v. Acevedo

    500 U.S. 565 (1991)   Cited 1,536 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding the Fourth Amendment does not preclude a warrantless search of a container in an automobile where there is probable cause to believe that it contains contraband
  5. Chambers v. Maroney

    399 U.S. 42 (1970)   Cited 3,665 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that seizing and holding a car on probable cause until a search warrant is obtained is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment
  6. Murray v. United States

    487 U.S. 533 (1988)   Cited 1,431 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that this determination is an issue of fact to be determined by the district court in the first instance
  7. United States v. Chadwick

    433 U.S. 1 (1977)   Cited 1,948 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that evidence obtained from search conducted ninety minutes after arrest must be suppressed because "no exigency" justified the search as incident to the arrest
  8. Johnson v. United States

    333 U.S. 10 (1948)   Cited 3,022 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding as invalid a search of defendant's home which “was demanded under color of office” even though the government officials did not possess a search warrant
  9. Carroll v. United States

    267 U.S. 132 (1925)   Cited 6,388 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding “contraband goods concealed and illegally transported in an automobile or other vehicle may be searched for without a warrant”
  10. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court

    57 Cal.2d 450 (Cal. 1962)   Cited 5,916 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Explaining the "rule requiring a court exercising inferior jurisdiction to follow the decisions of a court exercising a higher jurisdiction"
  11. Rule 8.500 - Petition for review

    Cal. R. 8.500   Cited 337 times

    (a)Right to file a petition, answer, or reply (1) A party may file a petition in the Supreme Court for review of any decision of the Court of Appeal, including any interlocutory order, except the denial of a transfer of a case within the appellate jurisdiction of the superior court. (2) A party may file an answer responding to the issues raised in the petition. In the answer, the party may ask the court to address additional issues if it grants review. (3) The petitioner may file a reply to the answer