51 Cited authorities

Brigham City v. Stuart
547 U.S. 398 (2006) Cited 2,569 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding subjective intent of officers does not control exigency analysis
Illinois v. Caballes
543 U.S. 405 (2005) Cited 2,507 times 32 Legal Analyses
Holding that use of narcotics-detection dog during a lawful traffic stop "generally does not implicate legitimate privacy interests"
Minnesota v. Dickerson
508 U.S. 366 (1993) Cited 3,113 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding a Terry search "must be strictly limited to that which is necessary for the discovery of weapons"
United States v. Place
462 U.S. 696 (1983) Cited 3,263 times 25 Legal Analyses
Holding 90-minute detention of luggage unreasonable based on nature of interference with person's travels and lack of diligence of police
United States v. Jacobsen
466 U.S. 109 (1984) Cited 3,027 times 23 Legal Analyses
Holding that a legal seizure of a package became illegal when officers conducted a field test on it because the test "affect[ed] respondents' possessory interests ... by destroying a quantity of the powder [thereby] convert[ing] what had been only a temporary deprivation of possessory interests into a permanent one"
Mincey v. Arizona
437 U.S. 385 (1978) Cited 3,689 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding that while statements obtained in violation of Miranda may be used for impeachment if otherwise trustworthy, the Constitution prohibits " any criminal trial use against a defendant of his involuntary statement"
Chambers v. Maroney
399 U.S. 42 (1970) Cited 3,664 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that seizing and holding a car on probable cause until a search warrant is obtained is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment
Rawlings v. Kentucky
448 U.S. 98 (1980) Cited 2,283 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that a defendant could not benefit from the unconstitutional search of another person's purse
Smith v. Maryland
442 U.S. 735 (1979) Cited 2,136 times 54 Legal Analyses
Holding that use of pen register was not a "search" for Fourth Amendment purposes
United States v. Salvucci
448 U.S. 83 (1980) Cited 1,689 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that a defendant could not benefit from the unconstitutional search of the apartment of his co-defendant's mother

ROBEY v. S.C. (PEOPLE)

51 Cited authorities

Holding subjective intent of officers does not control exigency analysis

Holding that use of narcotics-detection dog during a lawful traffic stop "generally does not implicate legitimate privacy interests"

Holding a Terry search "must be strictly limited to that which is necessary for the discovery of weapons"

Holding 90-minute detention of luggage unreasonable based on nature of interference with person's travels and lack of diligence of police

Holding that while statements obtained in violation of Miranda may be used for impeachment if otherwise trustworthy, the Constitution prohibits " any criminal trial use against a defendant of his involuntary statement"

Holding that seizing and holding a car on probable cause until a search warrant is obtained is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment

Holding that a defendant could not benefit from the unconstitutional search of another person's purse

Holding that use of pen register was not a "search" for Fourth Amendment purposes

Holding that a defendant could not benefit from the unconstitutional search of the apartment of his co-defendant's mother