12 Cited authorities

Kowis v. Howard
3 Cal.4th 888 (Cal. 1992) Cited 518 times 2 Legal Analyses
Acknowledging that Consumers Lobby is an exception to the general rule
Morohoshi v. Pacific Home
34 Cal.4th 482 (Cal. 2004) Cited 159 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding that although regional centers possessed many statutory and non-delegable duties to coordinate, monitor, implement and secure (though not provide) treatment services for the developmentally disabled by contracting with care facilities, the regional center's “monitoring responsibilities” were limited and did not require “the hour-by-hour monitoring that would have been required to prevent [the decedent's] tragic death.” The court noted that regional centers “could not possibly provide [such] continuous monitoring” and that the state legislature did not contemplate such a duty.
In re Rose
22 Cal.4th 430 (Cal. 2000) Cited 76 times
Discussing the meaning of the term "cause" in art. VI, § 14
Searle v. Allstate Life Ins. Co.
38 Cal.3d 425 (Cal. 1985) Cited 101 times 1 Legal Analyses
In Searle v. Allstate Life Ins. Co., 38 Cal.3d 425, 212 Cal.Rptr. 466, 696 P.2d 1308, 1315 (1985), for example, the California Supreme Court held that "[a] proper interpretation of the clause is that it exempts the insurance company from liability only if the insured, whether sane or insane at the time, committed the act of self-destruction with suicidal intent."
People v. Medina
6 Cal.3d 484 (Cal. 1972) Cited 110 times
In Medina, defendant's pretrial application for an extraordinary writ to review the denial of his motion to suppress evidence was summarily denied.
In re Attorney Discipline System
19 Cal.4th 582 (Cal. 1998) Cited 43 times
S073756 Filed December 3, 1998 Original Appeal, Original Proceeding XXX, Review Granted, Rehearing Granted Marie M. Moffat, Lawrence C. Yee, McCutchen, Doyle, Brown Enersen and Raymond C. Marshall for The State Bar of California. Daniel M. Kolkey, L. Michael Bogert and Brian W. Jones for Governor Pete Wilson. Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Anthony S. Da Vigo, Deputy Attorney General, Philip S. Anderson, Diane L. Karpman, Stephen R. Barnett, Anthony J. Bradisse, J. Anthony Vittal, John T. Philipsborn
Consolidated Theatres, Inc. v. Theatrical Stage Employees Union, Local 16
69 Cal.2d 713 (Cal. 1968) Cited 107 times
In Consolidated Theaters, the Court "observed that the memorandum makes no reference to the duration of the agreement."Id. at 724 (emphasis added).
Olson v. Cory
27 Cal.3d 532 (Cal. 1980) Cited 75 times 1 Legal Analyses
Declaring unconstitutional the state's attempt to limit certain cost-of-living increases in judges' salaries by amending a state compensation system; the state was required to pay judges entering office prior to the amendment at the then-mandated salary level
Bester v. Louisiana Supreme Ct. Com.
779 So. 2d 715 (La. 2001) Cited 23 times
Holding that the Louisiana Supreme Court has inherent authority to regulate all facets of the practice of law in Louisiana and to exercise that authority by promulgating a bar admissions regulatory scheme that exempts bar records from public disclosure
Briggs v. Resolution Remedies
168 Cal.App.4th 1395 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008) Cited 7 times
In Briggs, the parties had already selected an arbitrator, who stayed the arbitration until the insured pursued workers' compensation benefits, and the insured sought a writ of mandate from the trial court.

SANDER v. STATE BAR

12 Cited authorities

Acknowledging that Consumers Lobby is an exception to the general rule

Discussing the meaning of the term "cause" in art. VI, § 14

In Medina, defendant's pretrial application for an extraordinary writ to review the denial of his motion to suppress evidence was summarily denied.

In Consolidated Theaters, the Court "observed that the memorandum makes no reference to the duration of the agreement."Id. at 724 (emphasis added).

Declaring unconstitutional the state's attempt to limit certain cost-of-living increases in judges' salaries by amending a state compensation system; the state was required to pay judges entering office prior to the amendment at the then-mandated salary level

Holding that the Louisiana Supreme Court has inherent authority to regulate all facets of the practice of law in Louisiana and to exercise that authority by promulgating a bar admissions regulatory scheme that exempts bar records from public disclosure

In Briggs, the parties had already selected an arbitrator, who stayed the arbitration until the insured pursued workers' compensation benefits, and the insured sought a writ of mandate from the trial court.