§Why CasetextPricing

PEOPLE v. ANZALONE

Appellant's Petition for Review

29 Cited authorities

  1. Green v. United States

    355 U.S. 184 (1957)   Cited 2,268 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when a jury convicts a defendant on a lesser included charge and remains silent as to the greater inclusive charge, it impliedly acquits the defendant of the greater charge

  2. State v. Russo

    25 Cal.4th 1124 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 1,100 times
    Holding a "jury need not agree on a / / / specific overt act as long as it unanimously finds beyond a reasonable doubt that some conspirator committed an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy"

  3. People v. Jones

    51 Cal.3d 294 (Cal. 1990)   Cited 1,618 times
    Holding that "jury unanimity is [not] necessarily unattainable where testimony regarding repeated identical offenses is presented in child molestation cases"

  4. People v. Collins

    26 Cal.4th 297 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 233 times
    Finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect

  5. People v. Collins

    17 Cal.3d 687 (Cal. 1976)   Cited 306 times
    Holding California statute allowing substitution of alternate juror after submission proper under federal and state constitutions when construed as requiring deliberations to begin anew

  6. People v. Hendricks

    43 Cal.3d 584 (Cal. 1987)   Cited 128 times
    Holding that the order of the commission of the homicides was immaterial for implementation of a prior murder convictions special circumstance statute

  7. People v. Hernandez

    30 Cal.4th 1 (Cal. 2003)   Cited 73 times
    In People v. Hernandez, supra, 30 Cal.4th 1, the court addressed whether the erroneous dismissal of a juror pursuant to section 1089 and the substitution with an alternate would bar a retrial.

  8. Curry v. Superior Court

    2 Cal.3d 707 (Cal. 1970)   Cited 165 times
    In Curry, the trial court had declared a mistrial sua sponte on the ground that certain testimony had been erroneously admitted.

  9. People v. Traugott

    184 Cal.App.4th 492 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 33 times
    Taking judicial notice of distance between locations under Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (h)

  10. Carrillo v. Superior Court

    145 Cal.App.4th 1511 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 26 times
    In Carrillo, the court acknowledged that, unlike the federal courts, the state of California places limits on what constitutes legal necessity.

  11. Section 15

    Cal. Const. art. I § 15   Cited 3,314 times
    Affording “the right ... to compel attendance of witnesses in the defendant's behalf”

  12. Rule 8.1115 - Citation of opinions

    Cal. R. 8.1115   Cited 73,846 times

    (a) Unpublished opinion Except as provided in (b), an opinion of a California Court of Appeal or superior court appellate division that is not certified for publication or ordered published must not be cited or relied on by a court or a party in any other action. (b)Exceptions An unpublished opinion may be cited or relied on: (1) When the opinion is relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel; or (2) When the opinion is relevant to a criminal or disciplinary

  13. Rule 8.500 - Petition for review

    Cal. R. 8.500   Cited 337 times

    (a)Right to file a petition, answer, or reply (1) A party may file a petition in the Supreme Court for review of any decision of the Court of Appeal, including any interlocutory order, except the denial of a transfer of a case within the appellate jurisdiction of the superior court. (2) A party may file an answer responding to the issues raised in the petition. In the answer, the party may ask the court to address additional issues if it grants review. (3) The petitioner may file a reply to the answer