§Why CasetextPricing

PEOPLE v. McCULLOUGH

Appellant's Petition for Review

16 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Scott

    9 Cal.4th 331 (Cal. 1994)   Cited 3,904 times
    Holding that "complaints about the manner in which the trial court exercises its sentencing discretion and articulates its supporting reasons cannot be raised for the first time on appeal"

  2. People v. Welch

    5 Cal.4th 228 (Cal. 1993)   Cited 1,382 times
    Upholding curfew condition between “ ‘dark’ ” and 6:00 a.m.

  3. In re Estrada

    63 Cal.2d 740 (Cal. 1965)   Cited 4,250 times
    Holding that a defendant "is entitled to the ameliorating benefits of the statutes as amended" if "the amendatory statute lessening punishment becomes effective prior to the date the judgment of conviction becomes final"

  4. People v. Pacheco

    187 Cal.App.4th 1392 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 382 times
    Holding a defendant's failure to object to imposition of a booking fee does not forfeit an appellate challenge based on insufficiency of the evidence

  5. People v. Crittle

    154 Cal.App.4th 368 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 341 times
    Holding that the court security fee must be imposed on the count stayed pursuant to section 654

  6. People v. Lopez

    129 Cal.App.4th 1508 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 359 times
    Holding ineffective assistance prejudicial where defense counsel failed to object to improper impeachment of only witnesses contradicting the prosecution evidence

  7. People v. Viray

    134 Cal.App.4th 1186 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 288 times
    Holding that failure of counsel to contest an order for attorney fees did not forfeit an objection on appeal

  8. People v. Butler

    31 Cal.4th 1119 (Cal. 2003)   Cited 287 times
    Rejecting contention that case was moot based on Attorney General's supposition that testing had occurred and results already had been transmitted to victim

  9. People v. Gibson

    27 Cal.App.4th 1466 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 263 times
    Holding forfeiture doctrine applicable

  10. People v. Doganiere

    86 Cal.App.3d 237 (Cal. Ct. App. 1978)   Cited 340 times
    Concluding the statute applied retroactively because additional conduct credits effectively mitigated punishment

  11. Rule 8.1110 - Partial publication

    Cal. R. 8.1110   Cited 2,326 times

    (a)Order for partial publication A majority of the rendering court may certify for publication any part of an opinion meeting a standard for publication under rule 8.1105. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007.) (b) Opinion contents The published part of the opinion must specify the part or parts not certified for publication. All material, factual and legal, including the disposition, that aids in the application or interpretation of the published part must be published. (c) Construction For

  12. Rule 8.504 - Form and contents of petition, answer, and reply

    Cal. R. 8.504   Cited 21 times

    (a)In general Except as provided in this rule, a petition for review, answer, and reply must comply with the relevant provisions of rule 8.204. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007.) (b) Contents of a petition (1) The body of the petition must begin with a concise, nonargumentative statement of the issues presented for review, framing them in terms of the facts of the case but without unnecessary detail. (2) The petition must explain how the case presents a ground for review under rule 8.500(b)