§Why CasetextPricing

PEOPLE v. SANDERS

Respondent's Reply Brief on the Merits

7 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Harrison

    48 Cal.3d 321 (Cal. 1989)   Cited 1,344 times
    Upholding separate punishments for three acts of sexual penetration over the course of less than 10 minutes where "each of defendant's 'repenetrations' was clearly volitional, criminal and occasioned by a separate act of force."

  2. People v. Perez

    23 Cal.3d 545 (Cal. 1979)   Cited 997 times
    Finding "assertion of a desire for wealth as the sole intent and objective in committing a series of separate thefts" is overbroad and violates statute's purpose

  3. Neal v. State of California

    55 Cal.2d 11 (Cal. 1960)   Cited 1,594 times
    Holding that defendant who threw gasoline into a bedroom and ignited it could not be punished for both attempted murder and arson because the arson was the means used to commit the crime of attempted murder

  4. People v. Trotter

    7 Cal.App.4th 363 (Cal. Ct. App. 1992)   Cited 279 times
    Holding section 654 did not apply where the defendant had time to reflect between the three shots he fired at a pursuing police officer

  5. People v. Hall

    83 Cal.App.4th 1084 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 113 times
    In Hall, supra, 83 Cal.App.4th 1084, 100 Cal.Rptr.2d 279, the issue was “whether a single act of exhibiting a firearm in a threatening manner in the immediate presence of several peace officers in violation of section 417, subdivision (c), is punishable for as many times as there are peace officers present pursuant to the multiple-victim exception to section 654.

  6. People v. Milward

    52 Cal.4th 580 (Cal. 2011)   Cited 79 times
    Holding that under Rios's reasoning the phrase “other than a firearm,” as it appears in § 245's subd., which describes the crime of “assault ... with a deadly weapon ... other than a firearm,” is not an element of that crime

  7. People ex rel. Dept. Pub. Wks. v. Murata

    55 Cal.2d 1 (Cal. 1960)   Cited 20 times

    Docket No. L.A. 25903. December 13, 1960. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Clarence L. Kincaid, Judge. Reversed. George C. Hadley, Joseph A. Montoya, Hugh R. Williams and Charles E. Spencer, Jr., for Appellant. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General, B. Abbott Goldberg, Assistant Attorney General, K.D. Lyders, Deputy Attorney General, Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney (Los Angeles), Gilmore Tillman, Chief Assistant City Attorney for Water and Power, Russell B. Jarvis, Assistant