38 Cited authorities

Jackson v. Virginia
443 U.S. 307 (1979) Cited 77,659 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that courts conducting review of the sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction should view the "evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution"
Estelle v. McGuire
502 U.S. 62 (1991) Cited 19,985 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that a federal habeas court may not reexamine state court determinations of state law questions
Neder v. United States
527 U.S. 1 (1999) Cited 4,952 times 31 Legal Analyses
Holding that the failure to submit an uncontested element of an offense to a jury may be harmless
Chapman v. California
386 U.S. 18 (1967) Cited 23,494 times 28 Legal Analyses
Holding that error is harmless only if "harmless beyond a reasonable doubt"
Sullivan v. Louisiana
508 U.S. 275 (1993) Cited 3,283 times 14 Legal Analyses
Holding that a constitutionally deficient reasonable doubt instruction constitutes structural error as the deprivation of the right to trial by jury has "necessarily unquantifiable and indeterminate" consequences and "unquestionably qualifies as ‘structural error’ "
United States v. Gaudin
515 U.S. 506 (1995) Cited 1,659 times 15 Legal Analyses
Holding that a jury must decide whether a false statement under § 1001 is "material"
Griffin v. California
380 U.S. 609 (1965) Cited 4,846 times 27 Legal Analyses
Holding that prosecutor may not comment on a defendant's failure to testify
Rose v. Clark
478 U.S. 570 (1986) Cited 1,811 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that an unconstitutional instruction regarding malice in a murder case was subject to harmless-error analysis
Gilbert v. California
388 U.S. 263 (1967) Cited 3,085 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[t]he taking of [handwriting] exemplars did not violate petitioner's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination"
Yates v. Evatt
500 U.S. 391 (1991) Cited 794 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that harmless-error analysis of an unconstitutional burden-shifting instruction "requires an identification and evaluation of the evidence considered by the jury in addition to the presumption itself"
Section 7206 - Fraud and false statements
26 U.S.C. § 7206 Cited 3,820 times 22 Legal Analyses
Setting three years as maximum term of imprisonment for false tax return

PEOPLE v. GONZALEZ

38 Cited authorities

Holding that courts conducting review of the sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction should view the "evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution"

Holding that a federal habeas court may not reexamine state court determinations of state law questions

Holding that the failure to submit an uncontested element of an offense to a jury may be harmless

Holding that error is harmless only if "harmless beyond a reasonable doubt"

Holding that a constitutionally deficient reasonable doubt instruction constitutes structural error as the deprivation of the right to trial by jury has "necessarily unquantifiable and indeterminate" consequences and "unquestionably qualifies as ‘structural error’ "

Holding that a jury must decide whether a false statement under § 1001 is "material"

Holding that prosecutor may not comment on a defendant's failure to testify

Holding that an unconstitutional instruction regarding malice in a murder case was subject to harmless-error analysis

Holding that "[t]he taking of [handwriting] exemplars did not violate petitioner's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination"

Holding that harmless-error analysis of an unconstitutional burden-shifting instruction "requires an identification and evaluation of the evidence considered by the jury in addition to the presumption itself"

Setting three years as maximum term of imprisonment for false tax return