§Why CasetextPricing

RALPHS GROCERY v. UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION

Respondent’s Reply to Answer to Petition for Review

39 Cited authorities

  1. Perry Ed. Assn. v. Perry Local Educators' Assn

    460 U.S. 37 (1983)   Cited 2,244 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that content-neutral time, place, and manner restrictions on speech must be "narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest, and leave open ample alternative channels of communication"

  2. Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic

    547 U.S. 47 (2006)   Cited 813 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that nothing about having military recruiters on campus "suggests that law schools agree with any speech by recruiters"

  3. Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley

    408 U.S. 92 (1972)   Cited 1,333 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding a law was content-based where it prohibited nonlabor-related picketing at a place of employment

  4. Carey v. Brown

    447 U.S. 455 (1980)   Cited 733 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that ordinance violated equal protection where it banned all residential picketing except picketing of a place of employment involved in a labor dispute

  5. Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins

    447 U.S. 74 (1980)   Cited 726 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "views expressed by members of the public" in a privately owned shopping mall "will not likely be identified with those of the owner"

  6. National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley

    524 U.S. 569 (1998)   Cited 379 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the National Endowment for the Arts may decide who to subsidize based on aesthetic value of artworks because a subsidy is not a regulation on who can speak

  7. Simon Schuster v. Crime Victims Bd.

    502 U.S. 105 (1991)   Cited 451 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding statute "not narrowly tailored to advance [the government’s] objective" and so "inconsistent with the First Amendment"

  8. Hudgens v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    424 U.S. 507 (1976)   Cited 539 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding picketers "did not have a First Amendment right to enter [a privately owned] shopping center for the purpose of advertising their strike"

  9. Los Angeles Police Dept. v. United Reporting Publishing

    528 U.S. 32 (1999)   Cited 213 times
    Holding that there is no First Amendment right to receive addresses of arrestees

  10. Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner

    407 U.S. 551 (1972)   Cited 464 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a private shopping center did not violate the First Amendment by prohibiting the distribution of handbills on its property

  11. Section 107 - Issuance of injunctions in labor disputes; hearing; findings of court; notice to affected persons; temporary restraining order; undertakings

    29 U.S.C. § 107   Cited 339 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Requiring hearing prior to issuance of an injunction in labor disputes

  12. Section 214:6 - Labor disputes; injunctions; issuance; conditions precedent; procedural requisites

    Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 214 § 6   Cited 6 times

    (1) No court shall have jurisdiction to issue a preliminary or permanent injunction in any case involving or growing out of a labor dispute, as defined in section twenty C of chapter one hundred and forty-nine, except after hearing the testimony of witnesses in open court, with opportunity for cross-examination, in support of the allegations of a complaint made under oath, and testimony in opposition thereto, if offered, and except after findings of fact by the court, to the effect: (a) That unlawful

  13. Section 22-6-1-6 - Hearings; threatened unlawful acts; limitations; security

    Ind. Code § 22-6-1-6   Cited 4 times

    (a) No court of the state of Indiana shall have jurisdiction to issue a temporary or permanent injunction in any case involving or growing out of a labor dispute, as defined in section 12 of this chapter, except after hearing the testimony of witnesses in open court (with opportunity for cross-examination) in support of the allegations of a complaint made under oath, and testimony in opposition thereto, if offered, and except after findings of fact by the court, to the effect: (1) that unlawful acts

  14. Section 662.080 - Hearing and findings of certain facts are prerequisites to injunction

    ORS § 662.080   Cited 3 times

    No court, nor any judge thereof, shall have jurisdiction to issue a temporary or permanent injunction in any case involving or growing out of a labor dispute, except after hearing the testimony of witnesses in open court, with opportunity for cross-examination, in support of the allegations of a complaint made under oath, and testimony in opposition thereto, if offered, and except after findings of fact by the court, to the effect: (1) That unlawful acts have been threatened and will be committed

  15. Section 28-10-2 - Prerequisites and proof required for injunction

    R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-10-2   Cited 2 times

    (a) No court of this state shall have jurisdiction to issue a temporary or permanent injunction in any case involving a labor dispute, except after hearing the testimony of witnesses in open court, with opportunity for cross-examination, in support of the allegations of a complaint made under oath, and testimony in opposition, if offered, and except after findings of fact by the court to the effect: (1) That unlawful acts have been threatened and will be committed unless restrained or have been committed

  16. Section 49.32.072 - [Repealed]

    Wash. Rev. Code § 49.32.072   Cited 2 times

    RCW 49.32.072 Repealed by 2023 c 102,§ 32, eff. 7/23/2023. Amended by 2012 c 117,§ 130, eff. 6/7/2012. 1933 ex.s. c 7 § 7; RRS § 7612-7.

  17. Section 185.13 - LIMITED JURISDICTION OF COURT IN CERTAIN CASES

    Minn. Stat. § 185.13   Cited 1 times

    (a) No court of the state shall have jurisdiction to issue a temporary or permanent injunction in any case involving or growing out of a labor dispute, except after hearing the testimony of witnesses in open court, with opportunity for cross-examination, in support of the allegations of a complaint made under oath, and testimony in opposition thereto, if offered, and except after findings of fact by the court, to the effect: (1) that unlawful acts have been threatened and will be committed unless

  18. Section 20900 - Solicitation by Non-Employee Organizers

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 8 § 20900   Cited 18 times   6 Legal Analyses

    Labor Code Section 1140.2 declares it to be the policy of the State of California to encourage and protect the right of agricultural employees to full freedom of association, self-organization, and designation of representatives of their own choosing. (a) Agricultural employees have the right under Labor Code Section 1152 to self-organization, to form, join, or assist labor organizations, to bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing, and to engage in other concerted activities

  19. Rule 8.512 - Ordering review

    Cal. R. 8.512   Cited 3,575 times

    (a) Transmittal of record On receiving a copy of a petition for review or on request of the Supreme Court, whichever is earlier, the clerk/executive officer of the Court of Appeal must promptly send the record to the Supreme Court. If the petition is denied, the clerk/executive officer of the Supreme Court must promptly return the record to the Court of Appeal if the record was transmitted in paper form. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2018; previously amended effective January 1, 2016.) (b)Determination

  20. Rule 8.1105 - Publication of appellate opinions

    Cal. R. 8.1105   Cited 2,089 times

    (a)Supreme Court All opinions of the Supreme Court are published in the Official Reports. (b)Courts of Appeal and appellate divisions Except as provided in (e), an opinion of a Court of Appeal or a superior court appellate division is published in the Official Reports if a majority of the rendering court certifies the opinion for publication before the decision is final in that court. (Subd (b) amended effective July 23, 2008; adopted effective April 1, 2007.) (c)Standards for certification An opinion

  21. Rule 8.504 - Form and contents of petition, answer, and reply

    Cal. R. 8.504   Cited 21 times

    (a)In general Except as provided in this rule, a petition for review, answer, and reply must comply with the relevant provisions of rule 8.204. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007.) (b) Contents of a petition (1) The body of the petition must begin with a concise, nonargumentative statement of the issues presented for review, framing them in terms of the facts of the case but without unnecessary detail. (2) The petition must explain how the case presents a ground for review under rule 8.500(b)

  22. Rule 8.29 - Service on nonparty public officer or agency

    Cal. R. 8.29   Cited 6 times

    (a)Proof of service When a statute or this rule requires a party to serve any document on a nonparty public officer or agency, the party must file proof of such service with the document unless a statute permits service after the document is filed, in which case the proof of service must be filed immediately after the document is served on the public officer or agency. (Subd (a) relettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as subd (b).) (b)Identification on cover When a statute or this rule requires