§Why CasetextPricing

RALPHS GROCERY v. UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION

Appellant’s Answer Brief on the Merits

75 Cited authorities

  1. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

    512 U.S. 622 (1994)   Cited 1,299 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that rules that distinguish "based only upon the manner in which speakers transmit their messages to viewers, and not upon the messages they carry" are content-neutral

  2. Cornelius v. Naacp Legal Defense Ed. Fund

    473 U.S. 788 (1985)   Cited 1,554 times
    Holding that a charitable fundraising drive conducted in a federal workplace was a nonpublic forum

  3. Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian Bisexual Group

    515 U.S. 557 (1995)   Cited 696 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a marcher's message will likely be attributed to the parade organizer's, since "every participating unit" in a parade "affects the [overall] message"

  4. Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley

    408 U.S. 92 (1972)   Cited 1,333 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding a law was content-based where it prohibited nonlabor-related picketing at a place of employment

  5. International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness v. Lee

    505 U.S. 672 (1992)   Cited 598 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that speech restrictions in nonpublic fora must be viewpoint-neutral

  6. Carey v. Brown

    447 U.S. 455 (1980)   Cited 733 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that ordinance violated equal protection where it banned all residential picketing except picketing of a place of employment involved in a labor dispute

  7. Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins

    447 U.S. 74 (1980)   Cited 726 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "views expressed by members of the public" in a privately owned shopping mall "will not likely be identified with those of the owner"

  8. United States v. Kokinda

    497 U.S. 720 (1990)   Cited 493 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a sidewalk next to a post office was a nonpublic forum because it "was constructed solely to assist postal patrons to negotiate the space between the parking lot and the front door of the post office, not to facilitate the daily commerce and life of the neighborhood or city"

  9. Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Reich

    510 U.S. 200 (1994)   Cited 408 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Holding that petitioner's constitutional claims could first be brought before the agency

  10. Sable Communications of California, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

    492 U.S. 115 (1989)   Cited 462 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that indecency regulation of telephone messages was content-based restriction subject to strict scrutiny

  11. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,274 times   81 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355

  12. Rule 8.29 - Service on nonparty public officer or agency

    Cal. R. 8.29   Cited 6 times

    (a)Proof of service When a statute or this rule requires a party to serve any document on a nonparty public officer or agency, the party must file proof of such service with the document unless a statute permits service after the document is filed, in which case the proof of service must be filed immediately after the document is served on the public officer or agency. (Subd (a) relettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as subd (b).) (b)Identification on cover When a statute or this rule requires