28 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Mitchell

    26 Cal.4th 181 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 1,468 times
    Noting that a certified abstract of judgment "constitutes the commitment" and serves as "the process and authority for carrying the judgment and sentence into effect"
  2. People v. Zackery

    147 Cal.App.4th 380 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 487 times
    Vacating sentence for count on which defendant did not enter a guilty plea
  3. People v. Deloza

    18 Cal.4th 585 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 628 times
    Finding trial court expressly declined to strike a prior felony conviction, but misunderstood scope of its discretion to impose concurrent sentences
  4. People v. Jones

    103 Cal.App.4th 1139 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 478 times
    Holding that "section 654 is inapplicable when the evidence shows that the defendant arrived at the scene of his or her primary crime already in possession of the firearm"
  5. People v. Bell

    49 Cal.3d 502 (Cal. 1989)   Cited 365 times
    Finding it was “far from clear” that a 5 percent absolute disparity was sufficient
  6. People v. Britt

    32 Cal.4th 944 (Cal. 2004)   Cited 229 times
    In Britt, supra, 32 Cal.4th 944, 12 Cal.Rptr.3d 66, 87 P.3d 812, this court did not rely upon or cite the Neal footnote.
  7. People v. Garcia

    167 Cal.App.4th 1550 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 194 times
    Holding the defendant's intent in possessing a firearm during a series of robberies was different from his intent when stopped by police officers where he contemplated a shootout with police
  8. People v. Sloan

    42 Cal.4th 110 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 191 times
    Holding that sentencing for both murder and the firearm enhancement under section 12022.53, subd. (d) for discharge of a firearm causing death does not violate double jeopardy protections
  9. People v. Pearson

    42 Cal.3d 351 (Cal. 1986)   Cited 302 times
    Concluding defendant was properly convicted for lewd conduct on a child and sodomy based on the singular act of sodomy because "such charges clearly constitute 'different statements of the same offense' and thus are authorized under section 954"
  10. People v. Lopez

    119 Cal.App.4th 132 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 117 times
    In People v. Lopez (2004) 119 Cal.App.4th 132, the court held section 654 barred multiple punishment for the defendant's convictions for unlawful possession of a firearm and unlawful possession of ammunition, based on his possession of a single loaded firearm.
  11. Rule 8.204 - Contents and format of briefs

    Cal. R. 8.204   Cited 2,764 times

    (a) Contents (1) Each brief must: (A) Begin with a table of contents and a table of authorities separately listing cases, constitutions, statutes, court rules, and other authorities cited; (B) State each point under a separate heading or subheading summarizing the point, and support each point by argument and, if possible, by citation of authority; and (C) Support any reference to a matter in the record by a citation to the volume and page number of the record where the matter appears. If any part

  12. Rule 8.500 - Petition for review

    Cal. R. 8.500   Cited 234 times

    (a)Right to file a petition, answer, or reply (1) A party may file a petition in the Supreme Court for review of any decision of the Court of Appeal, including any interlocutory order, except the denial of a transfer of a case within the appellate jurisdiction of the superior court. (2) A party may file an answer responding to the issues raised in the petition. In the answer, the party may ask the court to address additional issues if it grants review. (3) The petitioner may file a reply to the answer