§Why CasetextPricing

IN RE M.M.

Respondent’s Request for Judicial Notice

13 Cited authorities

  1. White v. Ultramar, Inc.

    21 Cal.4th 563 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 462 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a single act of retaliatory termination demonstrated that a middle manager "determined corporate policy"

  2. Huff v. Wilkins

    138 Cal.App.4th 732 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 101 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Reversing summary judgment in favor of a minor who unlawfully drove an all-terrain vehicle (ATV) and collided with the plaintiff, because "[a]lthough a collision between ATV's was an inherent risk of the sport of off-roading, [defendant's] failure to comply with the safety regulations was not an inherent risk, for reasons discussed, and to any extent the failure increased the risk of a collision, [plaintiff] did not assume the increased risk merely by participating in the sport"

  3. California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform v. Bonta'

    106 Cal.App.4th 498 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 29 times
    Reversing summary judgment in favor of Department of Health Services, on ground that there were triable issues of fact with respect to claims that Departments informal enforcement policies and manuals were "subregulations" that the Department could not rely upon unless they were promulgated in accordance the Administrative Procedures Act

  4. In re Bacon

    240 Cal.App.2d 34 (Cal. Ct. App. 1966)   Cited 90 times

    Docket Nos. 22751, 22752, 22753, 22933. February 8, 1966. APPEALS from orders of the Superior Court of Alameda County in session as a Juvenile Court, placing several minors on probation without wardship, applying certain rules of conduct and behavior to them, requiring them to report to the probation officer and requiring them to spend four weekends at the probation department's training academy. Robert H. Kroninger, Judge. Orders affirmed. Robert Truehaft, Irving N. Bloom, Joel Goldfarb, John J

  5. People v. Snyder

    22 Cal.4th 304 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 19 times
    Taking judicial notice of ballot arguments regarding statewide proposition as legislative history and aid for interpretation

  6. Powell v. Superior Court

    232 Cal.App.3d 785 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)   Cited 12 times
    Noting that petitioners were charged, inter alia, with assault by force likely to produce great bodily injury, Cal. Pen. Ann. § 245 (West 1988) and being an officer unnecessarily assaulting or beating any person in violation of § 149

  7. People v. Crusilla

    77 Cal.App.4th 141 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 4 times
    Holding that a federal immigration inspector's arrest of defendant was authorized as a citizen arrest

  8. Gillum v. Johnson

    7 Cal.2d 744 (Cal. 1936)   Cited 63 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Gillum v. Johnson, 7 Cal.2d 744, at pages 760, 761 [ 62 P.2d 1037, 63 P.2d 810, 108 A.L.R. 595], this court said: "History discloses that financial panics, periods of depression or hard times are recurrent.

  9. Section 148 - Resistance, delay, or obstruction of public officer, peace officer, or emergency medical technician

    Cal. Pen. Code § 148   Cited 4,269 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Making it a misdemeanor to "willfully resist[], delay[], or obstruct[] any . . . peace officer . . . in the discharge or attempt to discharge any duty of his or her office or employment"

  10. Section 38000 - Authority to establish; school police department; qualifications for chief of security or school chief of police

    Cal. Ed. Code § 38000   Cited 14 times

    (a) The governing board of a school district may establish a security department under the supervision of a chief of security as designated by, and under the direction of, the superintendent of the school district. In accordance with Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 45100) of Part 25, the governing board of a school district may employ personnel to ensure the safety of school district personnel and pupils and the security of the real and personal property of the school district. It is the intent

  11. Section 33308.5 - Program guidelines to serve as model or example

    Cal. Ed. Code § 33308.5   Cited 1 times

    (a) Program guidelines issued by the State Department of Education shall be designed to serve as a model or example, and shall not be prescriptive. Program guidelines issued by the department shall include written notification that the guidelines are merely exemplary, and that compliance with the guidelines is not mandatory. (b) The Superintendent of Public Instruction shall review all program guidelines prepared by the State Department of Education prior to issuance to local education agencies.

  12. Rule 8.520 - Briefs by parties and amici curiae; judicial notice

    Cal. R. 8.520   Cited 3,160 times

    (a)Parties' briefs; time to file (1) Within 30 days after the Supreme Court files the order of review, the petitioner must serve and file in that court either an opening brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (2) Within 30 days after the petitioner files its brief or the time to do so expires, the opposing party must serve and file either an answer brief on the merits or the brief it filed in the Court of Appeal. (3) The petitioner may file a reply brief on the merits or

  13. Rule 8.252 - Judicial notice; findings and evidence on appeal

    Cal. R. 8.252   Cited 594 times

    (a)Judicial notice (1) To obtain judicial notice by a reviewing court under Evidence Code section 459, a party must serve and file a separate motion with a proposed order. (2) The motion must state: (A) Why the matter to be noticed is relevant to the appeal; (B) Whether the matter to be noticed was presented to the trial court and, if so, whether judicial notice was taken by that court; (C) If judicial notice of the matter was not taken by the trial court, why the matter is subject to judicial notice